Jump to content

 

 

Administration


Guest carter001

Recommended Posts

Guest carter001

I was told on Saturday that we would definately be going into adminisration after the tax hearing.

 

Following the hearing on the 24th November, Rangers will default on the first payment and be placed into admnistration. The stadium, murray park and the players that signed, or signed new contracts, as well as other assets are owned by another company and are safe. The players (that they want to keep) on older contracts will get new deals and the rest will be let go.

Jelavic will also go but, they are trying to ensure they get money for him.

Winning the league was not really part of the plan but, would be a nice bonus. And celtic are doing all they can to ensure we do!!

 

Don't shoot the messenger but, it sounds fairly logical to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The stadium, murray park and the players that signed, or signed new contracts, as well as other assets are owned by another company and are safe.

 

That part is bullshit. The stadium and Murray Park are owned by Rangers and the players must be contracted to the club as well or else they would not be allowed to play with the club.

 

After the hearing there are 2 options. We win the case and we will therefore not go into administration or we lose the case and appeal and will therefore not go into administration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest carter001
No-one knows the outcome of the hearing so not sure how anyone can say such an outcome is 'definite'.

 

Fair point but, i'm sure there are some within the club that know how its going to go.

 

I was only putting it up for discussion as it seemed logical. It would also make the balance of the £2.8m tax liability and the martin bain ringfenced money become irrelevant.

 

Personally, apart from the stigma of going into administration, it looks a good option to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest carter001
That part is bullshit. The stadium and Murray Park are owned by Rangers and the players must be contracted to the club as well or else they would not be allowed to play with the club.

[/b][/b]

After the hearing there are 2 options. We win the case and we will therefore not go into administration or we lose the case and appeal and will therefore not go into administration.

 

 

There have been players that are 'owned' by others and play for teams. Was that not the case with Tevez prior to going to man u? Also, there are players that set themselves up as companies to avoid paying 50% tax and only having to pay corporation tax on their profits.

 

Why couldn't the contracts be with the holding company Wavetower?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been players that are 'owned' by others and play for teams. Was that not the case with Tevez prior to going to man u? Also, there are players that set themselves up as companies to avoid paying 50% tax and only having to pay corporation tax on their profits.

 

Why couldn't the contracts be with the holding company Wavetower?

 

There was a huge fuss about players being owned by third parties (eg Tevez - West Ham almost got relegated because of it) and it's not allowed under FIFA rules (Article 18 of FIFA's Rules on the Status and Transfer of Players).

 

My understanding is that for a player to be registered with the SFA/SPL their contract requires to be with the club itself.

 

Also I doubt that Whyte would be able to transfer ownership of players to Wavetower without cash being involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also heard some claptrap about King buying the club from whyte "if" we go into administration.

 

as said before the tax case has the potential to go on for years. But if it does happen everything right down to the last teacup will be sold to pay the debt.

 

dont listen to gossip mate. just wait on the outcome of of the hearing. There is in fact the possibilty that we will win our case.

 

and the tims will be Raging if we do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest carter001
There was a huge fuss about players being owned by third parties (eg Tevez - West Ham almost got relegated because of it) and it's not allowed under FIFA rules (Article 18 of FIFA's Rules on the Status and Transfer of Players).

 

My understanding is that for a player to be registered with the SFA/SPL their contract requires to be with the club itself.

 

Also I doubt that Whyte would be able to transfer ownership of players to Wavetower without cash being involved.

 

 

 

There have been plently of rumours going about as to what might or might not happen. This was just one that seemed feasilbe.

 

I'm sure we'll all be watching very closely the outcome of the hearing but, regardlss of whos rumour is most accurate, if it goes against us, i'm sure there is a plan in place that will portect as much of the club as possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.