Statement from The Blue Order and Union Bears

[GovanAllan 0]

Fault on both sides but again it's the jackboot Hitler stewards most to blame got the people skills of a rabid Rottweiler

[calscot 0]

Seems to me that the BO need a designated video man who records everything, just in case. Every slight or major infringement by security needs to be reported to the police and Rangers along with the evidence and witness statements.

[Gazza_8 233]

I'm getting confused with this thread and the one that you created Craig.

[calscot 0]

  GovanAllan said:

Right where does that say I will say what I like, it say I'm had enough of being told what I can't say and enough is enough I don't once say let's go back to the way it was, you have just decided what kind of person you think I am by a few words well done you give yourself a pat on the back.

So going by your train of thought and the way No Surrender upsets you so much you approve of the No Surrender ban on all Rangers flags scarves and banners in the ground what next no Union flags either.

 

Will you actually answer one of my points or are you to busy picking holes in the wording of a sentence and passing judgement on me, must be great to be so perfect.

 

Look, if you can't even understand the implications of your OWN words and totally ignore the meaning of mine then there is no point talking to you.

 

I don't want to sound like some grammar pedant, but the way you write is already incredibly hard to understand as your punctuation is pretty much absent. People don't seem to think it's important any more but it is if you want to be understood - and if you don't want to sound like school kid who should be held back.

 

I have no idea what points you want answered - the only thing I engaged with you about was the "don't tell me what to do" attitude. You argue for it, then deny it, then argue for it again... Make up your mind.

 

Perhaps if you stop flying off the handle and actually think about what you're supposed to be debating, we'd get somewhere. Nobody's perfect but you seem to think you should be excluded from any criticism.

 

If you want to argue the semantics of your words, start writing in a way that is more understandable.

[Gazza_8 233]

[GovanAllan 0]

For once I agree with mate you live in your bubble I'll live in the real world. And for all you grammar police it called dyslexia my two sons and myself have it, but then I might just be talking crap, heh Calscot. That full stop in the right place for you. Ya #*#*#

Edited September 30, 2011 by GovanAllan

[craig 5,199]

  Gazza_8 said:

I'm getting confused with this thread and the one that you created Craig.

 

Ian created it

[Zappa 0]

  GovanAllan said:

For once I agree with mate you live in your bubble I'll live in the real world. And for all you grammar police it called dyslexia my two sons and myself have it, but then I might just be talking crap, heh Calscot. That full stop in the right place for you. Ya #*#*#

 

I don't think anyone here realised that you have dyslexia Allan because there's loads of people who post on forums who just can't be arsed with using proper punctuation. Thanks for letting us know because now we can reply to you with jumbled up sentences just to confuse the hell out of you!!

[GovanAllan 0]

  Zappa said:

I don't think anyone here realised that you have dyslexia Allan because there's loads of people who post on forums who just can't be arsed with using proper punctuation. Thanks for letting us know because now we can reply to you with jumbled up sentences just to confuse the hell out of you!!

 

Would make perfect sense mate, if it wasn't for the worlds greatest invention predictive text this sentence would take me 10 mins to write. Cheers

[Zappa 0]

The statement could have been ended more professionally if 'No Surrender' had been omitted, but I also don't see much point in making a big deal out of it. All in all it's a very good statement and one which is extremely worthwhile. It would be good to keep it going and support it in full because these new laws are never going to be even-handed in Scottish football and certainly appear to me to be not only Orwellian in nature, but geared towards specifically demonizing Rangers fans as being the worst culprits of so-called 'offensive behaviour'. Unfortunately, when the government get involved in football, for various reasons the club essentially have no choice but to tow the line and they won't be able to officially back the fans on this, but I think you can be sure that unofficially the club will be extremely pleased about the fans voicing their opinions on the matter.

Edited October 1, 2011 by Zappa