Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Anyone else find this bit amusing - " The consideration for the Acquisition was �£1, satisfied in full in cash"?

 

Aye - that appealed to my sense of humour too. Wonder if he flicked the coin onto the table, or held it preciously between his fingers and gently lay the sparkling golden coin down on the table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So can Ally front load the transfer budget as Whyte alluded to previous if need be?

 

That's also unclear. However there's nothing to stop himn doing it, and it'd make sense for Whyte not to commit to it here. What he's stating here is what the agreement is. Anything above that is irrelevant for the circular.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye - that appealed to my sense of humour too. Wonder if he flicked the coin onto the table, or held it preciously between his fingers and gently lay the sparkling golden coin down on the table.

IMG_1951.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know of someone who got "done" by the VAT man.... to the tune of about 10k. He promptly showed up at the York St, Edinburgh offices of HM Customs (as they were at the time) with a van load of pennies.

 

Customs had no option but to count them and accept them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pleasantly surprised by the circular.

 

We aren't debt free as has been mistakenly reported, but there is a commitment that the debt transferred to TRFCG will be waived if all goes well with the tax case.

 

There will be funds made available - up to �£5m working capital, �£5m transfer fund, a further �£20m for transfers in future years, �£2.8m to meet a tax liability and �£1.7m for the stadium.

 

However it is unclear as to whether this "investment" will be repayable to TRFCG at some point in the future. I guess we would assume that it is repayable, given that the document is silent on it.

 

The �£20m is to be an investment, either by TRFCG or someone found by them by 2016. The rest is not specified as an investment so won't be - it'll be loans that will be repayable. The fact it doesn't state these will be be by way of investment tells us that they won't be!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The �£20m is to be an investment, either by TRFCG or someone found by them by 2016. The rest is not specified as an investment so won't be - it'll be loans that will be repayable. The fact it doesn't state these will be be by way of investment tells us that they won't be!

 

Also doesn't mention that money as being added to the debt where it does other cash.

 

Tax issue is hugely important to our future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me that the wagons have been circled with regards to the tax issue, hope so anyway. Any good information on the likely time scale on hearing this case?

 

IIRC the initial judgement on the first-tier tribunal will be due sometime this month.

 

Obviously though either party may appeal that judgement which would delay the actual conclusion by a fair degree.

 

Generally, how long is a piece of string? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.