Bluedell 6,196 Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Ness is a different type of player to McCulloch. We need McCulloch in the team, particularly as we are going to have to play Weir for the rest of the season. We would ideally have both of them in the team, but McCulloch is more important to us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 IMO we have a player in Hutton who can be a far more effective player than McCulloch. McCulloch lacks mobility, has a poor passing range, lets people go past him far too easily and generally doesn't really give us any oopmh or drive from midfield. Hutton is far more mobile and energetic. His pasing and his movement is far better and he sees things on the pitch that McCulloch can only dream of seeing. Sad state of affairs when we're desparate for Lee McCulloch to come back. before his injury he wasn't exactly an effective player in our midfield. His 'hard man' tag is an absolute joke. He is easily brushed past by many opposition players and couldn't tackle a fish supper. He limits himself to 5-10 yard sideways or backward passes. If you watch him in a game, it is rare for him to pass the ball in a forward direction - and even when he does, his accuracy is shocking. No, i've never been a fan of him. He's been a very, very lucky boy to have played for Rangers and earned a fortune in doing so. Along with Lafferty I feel Smith threw �£6m down the drain when he signed them - and almost the same again on wages :disgusted: That is unforgiveable IMO. Give me Hutton any day over 'Big Lee' 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.