calscot 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Surely the offer is on condition of punting Miller for the same amount. I doubt even the bank can argue against one out, one in with a net zero financial impact - especially as we are already running so lean it's threatening our success in the SPL, cups and Europe, all of which could seriously impact our revenue. Lloyds have proven time and again, they don't have a clue about running a business - whether it's banking or a football club. With Murray almost killing the club with gluttony and then the bank starving it to death, we really need a Goldilocks in charge. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
metlika 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Surely the offer is on condition of punting Miller for the same amount. I doubt even the bank can argue against one out, one in with a net zero financial impact - especially as we are already running so lean it's threatening our success in the SPL, cups and Europe, all of which could seriously impact our revenue. Lloyds have proven time and again, they don't have a clue about running a business - whether it's banking or a football club. With Murray almost killing the club with gluttony and then the bank starving it to death, we really need a Goldilocks in charge. I think it would be more likely to be 2 out 1 in. I would guess the bank would agree with that as Goodwillie surely will be on less than Webster and Miller. If it was to happen of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I'd rather we held onto Webster and finally got some value for money out of him. We're going to need someone to step in when Davie Weir retires and we might not have money to replace Weir by buying in a quality player. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
metlika 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Webster is out of contract this season as well, i'd rather punt him now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Webster is out of contract this season as well, i'd rather punt him now. We probably wouldn't get money for him though and we might need him to help us win this title. Boogie is away on international duty at least twice between now and the end of the season. Or do we take a risk and ask Ross Perry to step up? Broadfoot is still walking with crutches, so our only other option would be moving Papac into central defense if Webster left. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Btw, Boogie's 2 international game trips could potentially keep him out for at least 4 of our games given our fixture backlog!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
metlika 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can see McCulloch playing at centre back and Hutton/Ness coming into the midfield. Unless Webster actually gets fit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totti 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Surely the offer is on condition of punting Miller for the same amount. I doubt even the bank can argue against one out, one in with a net zero financial impact - especially as we are already running so lean it's threatening our success in the SPL, cups and Europe, all of which could seriously impact our revenue. Lloyds have proven time and again, they don't have a clue about running a business - whether it's banking or a football club. With Murray almost killing the club with gluttony and then the bank starving it to death, we really need a Goldilocks in charge. If Lloyds know nothing about running a business how have our finances improved since they took control over the inept halfwits that ran our club 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totti 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can see McCulloch playing at centre back and Hutton/Ness coming into the midfield. Unless Webster actually gets fit. McCulloch at centre back might provide the opportunity for everyone to see how atrocious he is. The one good thing about McCulloch is he's 33 soon and will hopefully retire asap 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totti 0 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 We probably wouldn't get money for him though and we might need him to help us win this title. Boogie is away on international duty at least twice between now and the end of the season. Or do we take a risk and ask Ross Perry to step up? Broadfoot is still walking with crutches, so our only other option would be moving Papac into central defense if Webster left. McCoist isn't too much older than Weir, maybe he could play 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.