Single question for Brahimhemdani

[wabashcannonball 0]

wabash you've got an excellent way of asking a single question

 

It hasn't been answered, it appears only the auditor can answer it, by official statement, if I was he or she, I would be far from happy about having my ability/integrity trashed on a messageboard, in fact I would take serious steps to have that development rectified, if that was indeed required.

[boss 0]

It hasn't been answered, it appears only the auditor can answer it, by official statement, if I was he or she, I would be far from happy about having my ability/integrity trashed on a messageboard, in fact I would take serious steps to have that development rectified, if that was indeed required.

 

Perhaps they've conceded that they have been asked questions to which they have no answer?

[wabashcannonball 0]

Perhaps they've conceded that they have been asked questions to which they have no answer?

 

And how would you know they have conceded or have no answer, are you suggesting that he/she/they knowingly signed off accounts which were less than transparent and should have been qualified ???

[boss 0]

And how would you know they have conceded or have no answer, are you suggesting that he/she/they knowingly signed off accounts which were less than transparent and should have been qualified ???

 

I haven't said I know anything. You really need to be more careful with your language; I am surprised at you.

[wabashcannonball 0]

I haven't said I know anything. You really need to be more careful with your language; I am surprised at you.

 

You mused a possibility, so let me muse it back to you again.......how would you know, I am always careful, it's a matter of degree...:box:

[boss 0]

You mused a possibility, so let me muse it back to you again.......how would you know, I am always careful, it's a matter of degree...:box:

 

:confused:

 

Words don't appear to be your strong point.

[Totti 0]

And the trust wondered why Murray ignored them? Jesus I thought we were a mess, the RST are a shambles.

[rbr 1,270]

QUOTE=wabashcannonball;222207]Haud oan a minit here, folks are playing hard and fast with the auditors signing off of said accounts, as far as I am aware he never classed the underwriting of the tables as a loan, anything but from what I read.

 

So how come all of a sudden everybody knows better than the auditor, hope tae fek this isny turnin into another fekin "ellis sources told me" type of fiasco, and as sources and fiascos go.......that was the mother of all fekin fiascos...

 

 

And since you bring that subject up , it has since transpired that I was correct re-ellis and his business plan being sent to the RST , the man at the center of this fiasco has since admitted to certain people that he did in fact recieve a business plan from Ellis , the only bit I got wrong was the courier part , but there you go .

 

Seems mister Dingwall is everybit as good at smoke and mirrors as the mint

[BrahimHemdani 1]

Who pays for the legal fees incurred?

 

The overall RST membership........or the Board members (member) who caused the situation in the first instance?

 

The RST Members.

[BrahimHemdani 1]

Spill, who is the auditor, Enron ?

 

Milne Craig, Paisley firm.