Zappa 0 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Probably around �£1-1.5million as well I'd have thought considering we paid �£2million for him and haven't renewed his contract as yet (which runs out in 2012). . Can't see it happening mate. We'll keep him for now & maybe renew his contract depending in how he shapes up. He's just getting started IMO. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,295 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 .Can't see it happening mate. We'll keep him for now & maybe renew his contract depending in how he shapes up. He's just getting started IMO. Like I say, I don't disagree with that but every player has their price nowadays unfortunately. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Like I say, I don't disagree with that but every player has their price nowadays unfortunately. . Naismith's price should be higher than what you said though Frankie... whether it is or not is another story. The lad has far more potential than Lafferty IMO & we'd be looking for that sort of money for him... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers Football Club 0 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 CHIEF exec gives second contract offer to leading scorer Miller More... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,352 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 While I don't see Miller as being a huge success down in England I certainly don't think he "didn't cut it". For Wolves, Miller played 167 games for Wolves and scored 52 goals. For Derby, he played 30 games and scored 4. In total he played 197 games and scored 56 goals. That equates to a goal every 3.5 games. Again, not great for a striker but a decent return for two poor EPL sides at the time. FWIW, during his first spell at Rangers, he played 30 games and scored 8 goals - 5 of those being in one game. During the 00/01 season we were whipping just about every team we played. So you could say Miller didn't cut it for us. As far as I remember most of Miller's goals were in Wolves promotion year, and he only got a couple in the EPL. Saying Miller didnt cut it for us first time round is only adding to my argument, thanks for that! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flying Hippo Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 I think Gazza is using Wiki for his figures as they only use league goals. There was a spell during Miller's first spell at the club where he scored 9 goals in 6 games! He never got any real run in the team after that 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigRFC 0 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 It would be interesting to see the debate if he wasn't on form. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flying Hippo Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 It would be interesting to see the debate if he wasn't on form. You'd have to go back to his Derby or Celtic days for that 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigRFC 0 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 You'd have to go back to his Derby or Celtic days for that I don't think so, he was pretty poor at times even last season. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flying Hippo Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 I don't think so, he was pretty poor at times even last season. If you mean he had one off average/poor games then of course, every player does. I don't remember him ever having a prolonged spell of bad form during the last 2 years though. Certainly never more than 3 games anyway. His form since last November has been almost flawless 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.