ian1964 10,777 Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 So, how much cash do Rangers stand to make if:), the BHEASTS fail to qualify? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
metlika 0 Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I heard and extra �£2m.. thought it would be �£4m-�£5m 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanovitch 0 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 An extra �£2m that will probably go straight to Lloyds meaning Walter wont see a penny of it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 We get the other half of Scotland's tv money , the amount has yet to be announced , probably down to UEFA not knowing exactly who will be in the group stages , they tend to be a bit anal about things like this and dont announce estimates. I will post it as soon as it is on the UEFA site , as well as the Group fee , win and draw bonuses . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineflyer 0 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 An extra �£2m that will probably go straight to Lloyds meaning Walter wont see a penny of it. We ARE in far too much debt and it really DOES need to be repaid. There's just no getting away from that, it's what must be accepted at the very moment that money is borrowed. Paying back our debts isn't the problem, it was getting into such debt in the first place. Don't look at Lloyds as the enemy, look instead at the incompetent bastard David Murray, who oversaw the borrowing and failed utterly to manage the club's finances. Of course there needs to be a sensible balance between redeeming the debt and managing the club's ability to generate income going forward but please do not lay blame at the door of those from whom we borrowed money. I look at what's happening today at Rangers and have to say that the only sensible financial policy in recent times seems to be coming from the bank. I don't like what it means for the team but it is one of the two things that desperately needs to be done ... the other being to get David Murray the fuck out of Rangers once and for all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 We ARE in far too much debt and it really DOES need to be repaid. There's just no getting away from that, it's what must be accepted at the very moment that money is borrowed. Paying back our debts isn't the problem, it was getting into such debt in the first place. Don't look at Lloyds as the enemy, look instead at the incompetent bastard David Murray, who oversaw the borrowing and failed utterly to manage the club's finances. Of course there needs to be a sensible balance between redeeming the debt and managing the club's ability to generate income going forward but please do not lay blame at the door of those from whom we borrowed money. I look at what's happening today at Rangers and have to say that the only sensible financial policy in recent times seems to be coming from the bank. I don't like what it means for the team but it is one of the two things that desperately needs to be done ... the other being to get David Murray the fuck out of Rangers once and for all. If the money is not going to be spent on enhancing the squad, I would be happy enough if it meant the debt would be reduced. But I would like assurances this is actually happening. Does anyone have the figures to show the Debt reducing, in the period since we last paid for a player. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineflyer 0 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 If the money is not going to be spent on enhancing the squad, I would be happy enough if it meant the debt would be reduced. But I would like assurances this is actually happening. Does anyone have the figures to show the Debt reducing, in the period since we last paid for a player. OK, you're absolutely right CB, there are three things desperately needed at Rangers and the third of them is an honest, transparent and coherent relationship with the support. This will also require David Murray to be gone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 OK, you're absolutely right CB, there are three things desperately needed at Rangers and the third of them is an honest, transparent and coherent relationship with the support. This will also require David Murray to be gone. Now you really have went too far their mate , why not stick to things that may happen , like us wining the C/L or Scotland winning the world cup , Honesty .... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.