maineflyer 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I know you never asked me but in all seriousness, I still have significant doubts about this happening. In equal seriousness, from where we stand and with the lack of information available, how could anyone not have significant doubts that this will happen. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Got to laugh at the press for the way they pounce in stories like this that actually don't provide any new information. Anything to sell their tree pulp. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlyOneAmoruso 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 A few people doing it whether its the case or not For example, people in responsible positions leaking information to other people saying a deal has been done, 100% and all that. If Ellis takes over, where does that leave the RST? Will they attempt to engage him? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineflyer 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 If Ellis takes over, where does that leave the RST? Will they attempt to engage him? Would it make the slightest difference either way? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 If Ellis takes over, where does that leave the RST? . Probably 'bout a decade behind the NUST. :devil: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlyOneAmoruso 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Would it make the slightest difference either way? Depends what you mean... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineflyer 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Depends what you mean... I mean it's irrelevant whether the RST decides to engage a new owner or not. It will have no effect either way. Simples really. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlyOneAmoruso 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 I mean it's irrelevant whether the RST decides to engage a new owner or not. It will have no effect either way. Simples really. I understand what you mean by either way now. I might be inclined to agree at this moment in time. P.S Still no word from you know where 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 In the event of Murray selling his majority shareholding, is RFC liable to pay back loans to Murray's holding Co.? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union City Blue 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 If Ellis takes over, where does that leave the RST? Will they attempt to engage him? It would leave the RST (and all supporters who are interested in much better supporter involvement / partnership / ownership, call it what you will) in a similar position to it is now albeit with an opportunity to build a new and hopefully more constructive relationship than proved possible with the previous owner. So of course, it would seek to 'engage' and Ellis is already very aware of that. Can't hope to find out what a lot of people want to know via the likes of the probing little probe Chick Young. If he doesn't choose to engage directly with the RST initially then, as part of the Assembly the Trust would hope to be involved in any 'engagement'. Time will tell if it is relevant or has any effect either way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.