wabashcannonball 0 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 Good read. http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/411361348?-11344 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineflyer 0 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 Good read. http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/411361348?-11344 I saw that earlier. VB at its best, at the same time informing and challenging. In amongst the personal posturing and the downright incompetent, it's good to see someone chasing a little clarity. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted April 1, 2010 Author Share Posted April 1, 2010 Aye I know what you mean, PLG doesn't appear to like the direct approach, but I have my suspicions that he knows as much as us ...fek all 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,675 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 It just confused me more... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,686 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 There are certainly some unanswered questions. Plgsarmy confirmed that the RST did not know the name of the backer, so how could the fact that the document was given to the club, perhaps by the bank, reveal who the backer was? How would the club know the name if it was the RST's document and they did not know the name? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted April 1, 2010 Author Share Posted April 1, 2010 :)I'm always confused so it doesn't affect me.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 It amazes me that some "supporters" are actually revelling in all of this , very strange behaviour , god know's what you will do if this ever ends 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,675 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 It amazes me that some "supporters" are actually revelling in all of this , very strange behaviour , god know's what you will do if this ever ends I'm not sure anyone is revelling in anything to be honest. Sure, a few people will take the opportunity to make a dig but the point of confusion is a valid one. The last few months has seen source after source make claim after claim because of leak after leak. The Trust, the media, individual fans and others have taken an eager part in this game so it is no surprise people may start to lose patience or start to question the motives of the spin. All the more reason for people to keep their powder dry as no-one really knows exactly what is going on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted April 1, 2010 Author Share Posted April 1, 2010 The $64,000 is, why would Edgar be commenting on the finality of Ellis or anyone else, if as claimed he is or was involved in a rival bid/consortium/fairystory and how would he know anything about the situation with regard to Ellis/Murray/Rangers, maybe somethings are less secret than others, dependant on the blowers of the wind... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,675 Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 The $64,000 is, why would Edgar be commenting on the finality of Ellis or anyone else, if as claimed he is or was involved in a rival bid/consortium/fairystory and how would he know anything about the situation with regard to Ellis/Murray/Rangers, maybe somethings are less secret than others, dependant on the blowers of the wind... He'll just say he's now playing by the same rules as the others - given they claim someone leaked their progress. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.