Zappa 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Author Share Posted February 4, 2010 To work without a contract shows Walter, Ally and Kenny to be guys who actually care about this club and its future. It's an astonishing gesture which is beyond rare in football. . It's quite astonishing tbh, but it's not a good thing that we could lose them in the summer IMO. They could walk at any time, but it's expected that they'll at least see out the season. Basically, they won't leave us in the lurch. Something that's no doubt a worry for the club is whether the ST holders show the same level of loyalty knowing there's a fair chance of the team being stripped down due to losing and selling players. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gers4Life 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 very interesting indeed, listening right now on real radio. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,601 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Edgar just said something telling: 'say the truth Lloyds, instead of saying you're here to help Rangers, say you're here to get your money back'. Doesn't this back up what I keep harping on about? That we got into this mess ourselves, and they're just wanting their cash back. They own our debt and us, they're a bank. Why would they care about our wellbeing other than our staying affloat? What the heck is a protest against? 'Lloyds, stop operating like a bank and...er...er...ok, they ARE a bank, why are we protesting?' No, they are not acting as a bank in the way I'd expect banks to act. They should be trying to improve the well-being of the club to allow us to get in a position to repay the debt, and not stifle us, setting it up so that key management can leave tomorrow and key assets of the club can leave for nothing at the end of the season. You have very strange expectations of the way a bank should operate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,256 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 I thought he spoke very well and raised some very pertinent points , Muir is acting like a little hitler just now and needs brought down a peg or two 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Author Share Posted February 4, 2010 No, they are not acting as a bank in the way I'd expect banks to act. They should be trying to improve the well-being of the club to allow us to get in a position to repay the debt, and not stifle us, setting it up so that key management can leave tomorrow and key assets of the club can leave for nothing at the end of the season. You have very strange expectations of the way a bank should operate. . Rangers are a customer of the bank, but banks don't always care about their customers no matter how big their commitment is. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Lloyds are completely covered for a potential death of MIH and will recoup almost every penny should it happen. Anyone that thinks the bank cares about them is sadly misled. The bank cares about money, not it's customers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,601 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 .The bank cares about money, not it's customers. Tell me about it. I've probably had more run-ins with banks than most. They can still act totally unreasonably and cost themselves money at no risk to themselves. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Edgar conceeding that Muir is not a bank employee summed him up, who does he think employs Muir, surely not the man whom Edgar claims is 99.9% irrelevant and his share holding is worthless. If it wasn't a serious issue it would be laughable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlyOneAmoruso 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Have you heard of the phrase 'at the behest of' mate? A bank employee in all but name only. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Have you heard of the phrase 'at the behest of' mate? A bank employee in all but name only. No, but I see you have been getting a bit of a going over on the RM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlyOneAmoruso 0 Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 You could say that.... Glad the posters here are more hospitable to a different opinion 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.