wabashcannonball 0 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 So, who takes the hit for the �£52 million+ underwritten by SDM/Murray sports, as we are aware Murray sports is no more. ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 So, who takes the hit for the �£52 million+ underwritten by SDM/Murray sports, as we are aware Murray sports is no more. ? Which �£52m are you referring to? The one from the last rights issue? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 So, who takes the hit for the �£52 million+ underwritten by SDM/Murray sports, as we are aware Murray sports is no more. ? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH not this again , for a so called fan of our great club and continual defender of " the mint" you continually make a right arse of yourself , go on bring out the wee fishing line I cannot wait ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Returning Rangers chairman David Murray has confirmed a �£57m rights issue of shares designed to wipe out most of the club's crippling debt burden. John McClelland, as expected, drops down to vice-chairman. The new chairman's company, Murray International Holdings Ltd, which last week acquired �£8.7m shares from ENIC, will underwrite the rights issue. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ There isn't one I have missed is there..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Returning Rangers chairman David Murray has confirmed a �£57m rights issue of shares designed to wipe out most of the club's crippling debt burden. John McClelland, as expected, drops down to vice-chairman. The new chairman's company, Murray International Holdings Ltd, which last week acquired �£8.7m shares from ENIC, will underwrite the rights issue. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ There isn't one I have missed is there..... If that's what you are referring to then the answer is that Murray Sports were not involved in that rights issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 UOTE=Bluedell;187053]If that's what you are referring to then the answer is that Murray Sports were not involved in that rights issue. Dont get involved Bluedell it aint worth it 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 If that's what you are referring to then the answer is that Murray Sports were not involved in that rights issue. Now that we removed Murray sports from the equation, there cannot be many other candidates for taking the hit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Now that we removed Murray sports from the equation, there cannot be many other candidates for taking the hit. The �£50m also doesn't appear in MIH's group balance sheet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Ah I get the underwriting was a myth..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Ah I get the underwriting was a myth..... Nope. Try again.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.