craig 5,199 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Never a red card IMO,Dods had already hacked Miller down for the penalty,no booking, and wrestles with Miller then feigns injury,no booking. I won't hold my breath for this to be rescinded. Ian, I am not sure Dods deserved a booking for either of which you mentioned. He SHOULD have been booked for simulation though. Simulation isnt just diving, right ? Feigning a punch is simulation. For the penalty I dont see why he should have been booked. No intent, no malice, Miller was simply quicker than him and poked the ball away before he got to it. For the Miller red card I don't really think Dods was "wrestling" so he didnt deserve a yellow. He DID deserve a yellow when he started clutching his face though. Prick (Dods, not you Ian )! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Ian, I am not sure Dods deserved a booking for either of which you mentioned. He SHOULD have been booked for simulation though. Simulation isnt just diving, right ? Feigning a punch is simulation. For the penalty I dont see why he should have been booked. No intent, no malice, Miller was simply quicker than him and poked the ball away before he got to it. For the Miller red card I don't really think Dods was "wrestling" so he didnt deserve a yellow. He DID deserve a yellow when he started clutching his face though. Prick (Dods, not you Ian )! Agreed Craig,I was just making reference to the way the MOPE in black dished out cards to Rangers players for nothing tackles 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Aye, it did look like there was an agenda. I couldnt believe Little got booked for his 1st tackle in the game and it wasnt even malicious. I initially thought McCulloch's booking was harsh but when you see it again he tried to follow through and near kicked the guy in the midriff, which is just a tad too high - unless it was Dods in which case anywhere below his ugly mush would have been too low. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Aye, it did look like there was an agenda. I couldnt believe Little got booked for his 1st tackle in the game and it wasnt even malicious. I initially thought McCulloch's booking was harsh but when you see it again he tried to follow through and near kicked the guy in the midriff, which is just a tad too high - unless it was Dods in which case anywhere below his ugly mush would have been too low. I'm all for fairness & parity mate,but I never seen that last night,it wasn't a dirty game just poor refereeing again 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.