The Rangers AGM - The More People Talk, the Less They Say

[craig 5,199]

Guys, you could BOTH be right.

 

As wabash says the article attributes Duffy as saying King contacted him a month prior.

 

As your friend says rbr, Duffy contacted King on the Friday and the papers were held up.

 

Can you not see that you could both be right in this regard ?

[rbr 1,256]

Guys, you could BOTH be right.

 

As wabash says the article attributes Duffy as saying King contacted him a month prior.

 

As your friend says rbr, Duffy contacted King on the Friday and the papers were held up.

 

Can you not see that you could both be right in this regard ?

 

Yes except King told my friend he has never spoken to Duffy nor knew who he was before he contacted him , and my mate is in a position that he would need to know that info before anything goes to print , like I say they took a gamble on a story but now believe they were getting used , by whom they dont know .

 

I will know more next week

[bmck 117]

Also King is only reporting what Duffy says , it isn't a court of law , and if you read through the rest of it there are plenty of contradictions

 

I dont know (and am still not sure why its important), but it doesnt seem ridiculous for king to leave that line in, even if its not fact. Like anything else, he has deadlines and its not inconceivable he either didnt notice it, or didnt think it was worth the effort to get it changed.

[Bluedell 5,612]

King confirmed on RC that Duffy had contacted him. I heard him saying that prior to the article that wabash quotes, and I was surprised at the contradiction when i read it a few days after his RC statement.