Jerome R Jerome: 1 Man on a Mission

[calscot 0]

I agree, there was nothing wrong with his deliveries last night. He had 1 bad FK that the 1st man cleared but other than that he was excellent.

 

Fraser, it's 'took' not 'toke'. Fuckin' annoying reading that! :box:

 

I thought he was talking about spliffs...

 

I get confused about the huts as well... :box:

[calscot 0]

Seeing as we're being pedantic, it's also cross-cum-shot. I think that spelling has become so bastardised by the sleazy that people are afraid to use it properly.

[calscot 0]

Kept the ball well and he even toke players on !!

His delivery wasnt good ? Confused, his ball into Papac for the header, the ball in which Naismith headered down to Mendes, the corner in that Whittaker had a good chance from, surely there is others as well. Also his cross come shot that nearly caught Lehmann out

 

He had a few very good deliveries granted, but he needs to do that more often. More than half the time, he ruined some great work with a poor delivery.

 

I'm not expecting Beckam but surely ONE of our players should be able to hit a reliably decent free kick or corner.

 

I think more practice is needed at MP for everyone.

[Gazza_8 233]

I thought he was talking about spliffs...

 

I get confused about the huts as well... :box:

 

Aye, 'hut' is another one. "He hut the post".

[craig 5,199]

Leave Fraser alone ya bunch a bassas !

 

I have to confess it annoys me too but Fraser has grown up in a txt speak era unlike us old codgers. Or it could be phonetic (had an ex-girlfriend that was phonetic and it makes it more difficult to spell properly, so I was told).

 

My wife's 19 yr old brother grew up with txt speak too and he has the worst spelling I could ever imagine in a somewhat bright kid. I find myself shaking my head in disbelief at it.

 

I am sure Fraser doesn't mean it - and I am sure he sees your suggestions as helpful. Hopefully anyway !