Bluedell 5,883 Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 Was there anyone willing to pay more for him? A question that none of us can answer but there wasn't much interest from anyone else, and we are better off getting the cash and getting him off the payroll than risking keeping him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 Was there anyone willing to pay more for him? A question that none of us can answer but there wasn't much interest from anyone else, and we are better off getting the cash and getting him off the payroll than risking keeping him. Aye, I suppose it's his agent's fault, if anyone. He seems like a player you should be able to sell fairly easily to championship sides. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,883 Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 I'd put it down to his lack of pace. That will put a lot of teams off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 I'd put it down to his lack of pace. That will put a lot of teams off. Most definitely. Pace is crucial in this day and age unless you have something "special" and whilst Charlie Adam is a decent set piece taker he doesnt have that something special IMO. He also has a bad habit of choosing the wrong pass and putting the team under pressure. Barry, I agree that we are looking desparate and we have SDM, Martin Bain & WS to thank for that. No team should EVER make a public statement that the club is in the shit financially and that every player in the squad is available. It shows your hand, it tells other clubs you are desparate and makes you susceptible to vultures low-balling in the knowledge you need the money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.