alanmidd 0 Posted June 12, 2009 Share Posted June 12, 2009 That might be true Frankie, but we dont really give anybody a free role. Nobody gets away with not doing a specific role, both offensively and defensively, hence the reason behind so many Boyd debates, so we are certainly not going to give a free role to Naismith. Makes you wonder why we bought him though, doesn't it? It was hardly small change. To stop Celtic getting him? Or is that me just me being cynical? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 12, 2009 Share Posted June 12, 2009 To stop Celtic getting him? Or is that me just me being cynical? He wouldn't have played for the mopes. They tried to sign him & he knocked them back. He's been a Gers fan since he was a kid AFAIK. When he lined up for Killie with Boyd in the team, they were causing most SPL teams serious problems & he contributed to many of Boyd's goals with assists. I think the guy could be a great player for us as long he can stay free of major injury for a few seasons. When he's up to full fitness he's a pacey, skillful & strong player. Still really young too, which means if does come good, the investment will have been sound. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.