Gazza_8 233 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 No, but me being a Rangers fan, it is not good watching a Scotland game because of the bile that is spewed towards our players What bile is spewed towards Rangers players? Perhaps they bring it on themselves. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Another thing..... there was very little doubt that Burley was going to use them on Wednesday night - the whole squad would have known that they were on the bench for no reason other than to fill it. So why not just tell the squad this was the case and then let BF and AM just go home, thus avoiding the spotlight and, just as importantly, trying to get the nation to focus on the task at hand - instead he put them on the bench and effectively left then hung out to dry. I am not trying to defend BF or AM in this, no way would I do that - but there are others here who also could have acted differently. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 What bile is spewed towards Rangers players? Perhaps they bring it on themselves. As an example, one cunt near me when Fergie scored against Italy, when the cheering subsided shouted I wont cheer a goal from that Hun-bastard! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 What bile is spewed towards Rangers players? Perhaps they bring it on themselves. I just got an email from a "Scotland fan" which said that Whittaker should have been banned too....... but the others should be let off. That, to me, is an indication of the mentality of some sections of the TA. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I just got an email from a "Scotland fan" which said that Whittaker should have been banned too....... but the others should be let off. That, to me, is an indication of the mentality of some sections of the TA. I assume this is a "friend" of yours? You should keep better company. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Another thing..... there was very little doubt that Burley was going to use them on Wednesday night - the whole squad would have known that they were on the bench for no reason other than to fill it. So why not just tell the squad this was the case and then let BF and AM just go home, thus avoiding the spotlight and, just as importantly, trying to get the nation to focus on the task at hand - instead he put them on the bench and effectively left then hung out to dry. I am not trying to defend BF or AM in this, no way would I do that - but there are others here who also could have acted differently. I agree the shouldn't have been anywhere near Hampden on Wednesday as the main focus was on them but they didn't help themselves and had plenty of time to think about what they were doing and surely what would happen....... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 As an example, one cunt near me when Fergie scored against Italy, when the cheering subsided shouted I wont cheer a goal from that Hun-bastard! Shit, I'll give you that one. The whole flicking the vickies didn't help matters though. Pathetic and immature! By the way, I agree about the TA, well the majority of the TA anyway being a-holes! Off topic here but we should get admin to install an arsehole smiley. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Shit, I'll give you that one. The whole flicking the vickies didn't help matters though. Pathetic and immature! By the way, I agree about the TA, well the majority of the TA anyway being a-holes! Off topic here but we should get admin to install an arsehole smiley. I'll pass on your request. Lol. They aren't necessarily all arseholes, But there is a fair number. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I assume this is a "friend" of yours? You should keep better company. Exactly. The funny thing is that, as soon as I put it to them that there is an anti-Rangers element in the TA, they believe that it is conspiracy theory from huns...... Bugs my tits so it does. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Exactly. The funny thing is that, as soon as I put it to them that there is an anti-Rangers element in the TA, they believe that it is conspiracy theory from huns...... Bugs my tits so it does. Nope, you're definitely going to have to explain that one to me. I'm flummoxed (sp). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.