Jump to content

 

 

colshy18

  • Posts

    3,187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by colshy18

  1. right then, so success is achieved by what you alone think of them then? what have arsenal ever done in europe? won a mickey mouse cup in a third rate competeion? is that what your gauging arsenals success on? so, by the same token then, i` personally will deem arsenal a FAILURE domestically until they actually show they can RETAIN a title then.....the TRUE sign of a great team! as for tick fucking tock. who told you that pish? mourinho is here until 2010 AT LEAST. but if thats what you want to believe in your warped little mind, then so be it. more like wenger is in danger of leaving before mourinho. it`s quite apparant by your domestic results last season that he`s over stayed his welcome. what did you win last season again?
  2. yes, but when you examine who were the biggest spenders the years arsenal won their leagues, i can assure you that they bought amongst the biggest in the country. dont think gersfem is comparing arsenals spening to chelseas because you cannot compare. it`s different seasons, different years. but arsenal HAVE indeed bought leagues too. reyes anyone? forget about him when you went over viera and henry gav?
  3. fine. thats your perogative;)
  4. danny, i don`t have to words into your mouth when you say "but if the chelsea fans online are indicative of chelsea fans in general, then it`s clear why chelsea as a whole are so disliked" they only chelsea fans online are me, koeman, dunn and gersfem. it`s clear that NO-ONE else on gersnet, as far as i know, supports chelsea. therefore, how can it mean much else. i should`ve wrote "so what your saying is.....in so many words" but didn`t, but it still doesn`t really mean anything more than i`ve said all ready. what you are clearly saying is that the chelsea fans online are very dislikable. no, not whatsoever. and i don`t know how you have come to this conclusion at all. what i`m trying to get at is that chelsea fans on this forum are not the `smug` and `arrogant ` people that you`ll have them out to be. again, how do you arrive at this conclusion? i`m not twisting i`m merely giving you an example to draw your comparison with. i`m simply asking what the critera is for disliking chelsea fans? it appears as though no chelsea fan is allowed to defend their team if someone desides to attack it. you say "it`s clear why chelsea fans are disliked as a whole" ,so can you explain to us how clear it is then? thats fine, i didn`t really want it as a personal slur against me or the others but it wasn`t very well explained and had to be cleared up in my opinion. however, when you say the "the ones online are indicative of chelsea fans in general" it is pointing towards the only four chelsea fans online that i`m aware of. if two successive premiership titles doesn`t explain what i`m proud of then i cannot explain it to you as you obviously don`t realise what winning means in football. ok, it`s time to stop playing silly buggers. so, you say "but if the ons online are indicative of chelsea fans in general, then it`s clear why chelsea as a whole are also disliked." you are saying that the people "online" are some other people then? forgive me for i thought i knew the only four chelsea fans on this forum as myself, dunn, koeman and gersfem, but are you trying to tell me that when you say "the ones online" that you are referring to another forum far from here? if so, why would you want to come on here and make that statement KNOWING that the chelsea fans on THIS forum would more than likely want to know who the "ones online" that you refer to, are? if it is not the "ones online" on this forum maybe you should have tried to be more selective with your language incase some "other" fans got confused and thought that the "ones online " were the only "ones online" who are chelsea fans on this forum? danny, were you or were you not talking about chelsea and it`s fans in this statement? if your trying to say that "the ones online are indigative of chelsea fans in general" means your talking about actaully man.utd fans, then i am becoming confused. again, IF you are actually talking about other fans or teams then maybe you should use their names like you did with chelsea it`s not hard correct! you have not mentioned me. but, you have mentioned "the ones online" again, if your referring to another forum maybe you should become clearer again. for example, if i were to go onto the rangers chat and say "the ones online are not true suporters", i`m quite sure most of the people on line at gersnet would THINK i was talking about them. i`ve already said youmay not be referring to who i listed, but if you were in our position could you not see how a statement worded like this could be confused for referring to them? so, now you are denying that you stated that "if the ones on line are indicative of chelsea fans in general, then it`s clear why chelsea as a whole are disliked"? you quite clearly refer to chelsea in your first paragraph and evedently go on to converse what you think of them. why are you denying that you made this point? yes, exactly you said the ones online, which refers to who? so, if your not smearing the whole support then which section are you smearing then? danny, i`m a chelsea fan, not an imbecile! ok, if your not referring to the ones online then who are you referring to?
  5. yeah quite like that one too:)
  6. can`t say i`m too suprised, but thats not to say big marv never done a good job at gers, cause he did an excellent job! just feel it`s time for him to move on now and let the new brigade have a shot at success now. i`ll follow the rest of hs career with interest. one highlight i remember about marv was the distance he could get on the ball when he headed it out of defence. sat in the broomloan one time and it came at him and he jumped and headed it back towards the oppositions goal from his own penalty box. i swear it landed 10/15 yards short of the OPPOSITIONS penalty box! must have a neck like mike tysons to do that!
  7. any vids on it yet craig? man, that is SO depressing to know that maribor knocked them out after what villareal did to us!
  8. so really what your saying then is that you find, dunn, koeman, gersfem and i extremely dislikable people?? extremely sweeping statement to make going by what you READ on a forum is it not? just what is the critera for disliking chelsea fans then? should they be quiet, timid, shy, retiring creatures who let anyone wind them up or persistantly bombard them with tosh about how they are such a false team etc? are you sure? so, if i were to come onto the rangers boards and state that `i`m not wanting to be offensive to anyone, but you and your team are totally useless and your all rather volatile and obnoxious` then i could simply say it`s nothing personal? ` just going by what i read?` are you sure your not confusing smugness with pride? remember, chelsea last won the league decades before we won this one. you don`t know me danny, but if you did you wouldn`t be saying this. yes, i reply to many posts or start many threads but thats what a forum is for. if i were to simply say `oh goody we won the league, but shhh better not upset the neighbours by saying anything` then i don`t think i`d be much of a `supporter`. we waited years for a league title and then we got 2 in a row. i personally feel i have a right to stick it up every goons nose i come across after YEARS of the same kind of treatment. danny, this is simelar to rangers and celtic. if they win a cup they shove it down our throats, if we win one we do the same. much like the old firm do everytime. i believe many fans do this as part of a footballing `culture` so, i would therefore conclude that rangers and celtic supporters are like this also. i feel it is VERY unfair to class ONLY chelsea fans as `smug` and `arrogant`. well, in that case i would say you are obviously not a supporter and therefore should steer clear of as many chelsea posts as possible, because if you think my posts are smug and arrogant you should read some from hardcore fans on the chelsea forums. trust me, i`m lightweight compared to these geezers. also though, it amazes me how much you can criticise one teams supporters when you freely admit to knowing NONE personally! sureley you should make a conscious effort to test out your theory before condeming the whole team and all it stands for? danny, i realise you may not be having a dig at chelsea fans on here, but, it seems such a rash statement which can`t really be foolproof if you don`t really know us. i hope you don`t take any of this personally, but i felt i had no choice but to reply!
  9. your right gav i did go on and on about him leaving. but, it was more to keep winding you up than anything else;) cole however, is a completely different kettle of fish altogether and i definetly DO see this one occuring soon. don`t say i didn`t warn you craig:admin:
  10. and he`s not PART of the new midfiled??
  11. the fact i seen this �£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£�£ before my eyes when i seen that made my mind up.
  12. in answer to your first question, YES YES YES he WAS that bad craig. he was so shaky at the back that j.t was virtually playing in two postions trying to cover the scmuck. it`s a hard one to call craig. but, all the signs are there if you look..... 1.we`ve only got one recognised left back in wayne bridge now. 2. mourinho has PUBLICLY stated that he WILL bring in one more player. 3. ashley cole has criticised arsenal in his book. 4. mourinho is KNOWN to want AT LEAST two players of extremely high quality for each position. it`s probably neck and neck between roberto carlos and ashley cole, but i`ve heard mourinho is really wanting cole but may opt for carlos as a short term option if he can`t get himthis summer. i wouldn`t want to curse your bet, or give you the wrong player, but as i said all th signs are there and i`m beginning to believe it may well happen after all. i`m at 60/40 in FAVOUR of cole coming to chelsea now. previosly i was at 40/60!!!!
  13. but how can you say your not impresed with the midfield if you like the look of clement, n`diaye and buffel?
  14. cheers craig! i`m putting that on on monday:)
  15. del horno`s also away to valencia for 5million *party at mine:D
  16. i`m quite impressed with our new look midfield already. clement and ferguson or hemdani if playing two defensive midfielders will be awesome although if he does i`m sure he`ll let ferguson get forward when he can to help th others. sionko looks to be fitting right in so far and if you add buffel who looks to have bucked up his ideas, then we are looking very strong indeed. wonder what formation he`ll use. i suspect he may have used todays game as a marker for more difficult games, like europe away, septic away etc where he may be thinking of 2 def midfielders in front of the back 4. they are notoriously difficult to break down and more and more teams are adopting them in england!
  17. craig, can you find out what chelsea to win the league and champions league and f.a cup treble would be??? also, i asked this before, but any chance of finding what rangers to reach uefa cup final would be too?
  18. things can change VERY quickly my north scottish friend! that WILL be changing from next season.
  19. i seen it with my own eyes though danny. if you look to the top tier it`s half empty;)
  20. anyone remember this happening when lionel charbonier made a save at ibrox?
  21. thers nowt wrong with that when it comes down to arsenal craig:admin:
  22. :yawn: :yawn:
  23. YEAH CAUSE GAV`S A GOONER AND WANTS ALL THE PLAUDITS FROM STARTING THE THREAD:yawn:
  24. we ALWYAS sell out;) 52,000
  25. fair enough. i just don`t think you can count them out ever. they WILL strengthen before the season starts and more than likeley it`ll be either that big defensive midfileder from lyon, or someone form juve etc. with rooney uyp front and whoever else they sign to partner him, i think theyll be as strong as ever. their weakest link? rio ferdinand!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.