-
Posts
5,183 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Everything posted by DMAA
-
Match Preview [FT] Rangers 1 (Tavernier 87' pen) - 3 Ajax
DMAA replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
I thought King was poor for that goal too, he seemed to slow right down rather than throwing his body in front of the shot. -
It’s going to take a lot more than silencing the lambs at Halloween to convince me.
-
Between Lundstram and Sakala but I’ve opted for Lundstram due to Sakala not doing as much as he should have with his opportunities.
-
The stats say the opposite. See my comment in the man of the match thread, won more duels than anyone else and wasn’t dispossessed once. For comparison, Kent was dispossessed 6 times.
-
He certainty isn’t easily brushed off the ball, quite the opposite. For me, Tillman is one who should have a future here. He would do well in a proper team who play good football.
-
Player Ratings Napoli 3 - 0 Rangers: Player Ratings and MotM Poll
DMAA replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Agree with your ratings but I’d make a slight defence of Tillman. He won more duels than anyone else, 5/7 ground and 3/5 aerial. Also made 2 tackles, 6 recoveries and 2/3 successful dribbles, dispossessed 0. If that doesn’t sound that impressive, you should see the rest, they are generally abysmal. King didn’t make a single tackle or have a single successful duel, and he’s a defender. Kent actually had a much better game than usual in terms of duels but still only won 1 in 3 ground duels and zero aerial, he was dispossessed 6 times. FotMob rated Tillman as our best player, and that’s purely based on stats so take it with a pinch of salt, but my point is that I think he has been a bit over-criticised. I thought he was ok. -
Our recruitment in Kent’s position has been absolutely woeful. I have been asking for strong competition for Kent since his first season but every season we have gone all in on Kent and only recruited cheap, back-up type players. As things stand even I see a role for Kent (rotation) if we stick to this formation because the competition is so poor. Morelos on the other hand has stronger competition and is getting more game time than he deserves. Go and check a picture of him from 2017 when we signed him, you’ll be shocked at how much weight he has put on since then.
-
Fair point, I take it back. I’d like a front two of Colak and Sakala. Colak for the goals and a decent aerial presence and Sakala for pace. We can’t stretch the game with Morelos up there, he is so slow. Colak and Sakala could compliment each other well and we would be much quicker counter attacking.
-
For me, it’s just not good enough though. Scoring goals is his main job and he is wasteful more often than not. There was one other notable occasion where his lack of any pace whatsoever meant a very good chance with him through on goal ended with a fluffed shot because a defender had caught up with him. If Sakala had been in that position he’d have got right in on goal. There were other instances too where he was sluggish. He did have good moments but it isn’t enough.
-
I’ve criticised him for two specific incidents and he deserved it.
-
You are very overly defensive of him. I haven’t criticised him before, but that goal was on him, he was on the man and then completely lost him.
-
Classic Kent ruining a great breakaway there. Why is he still on the pitch?
-
Pathetic from Lundstram there.
-
We should bring Colak on. Morelos has done ok at times with some decent passes, but when opportunities come along he is just so slow and the chance goes.