Jump to content

 

 

DMAA

  • Posts

    5,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Posts posted by DMAA

  1. 23 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

    Oh-no. :D 

     

    I can only say it so many times: For me, a better manager gets more out of this squad. The squad is not inherently bad. (That's not to say it doesn't need refreshed, and it's certainly short in some areas - which I've stated regularly.)

     

    Your argument seems to be that motivation and results fluctuate, so the whole squad needs replaced. I'm not sure how one would measure motivation; it is too subjective. Results have fluctuated. If you can use bad results to suggest the squad is poor, I can use the good results to suggest the squad is good, or at least capable of being good. It's just different interpretations. 

     

    For me, performances have been consistently bad under GvB. I even think they were better under SG, despite wanting him gone because it had become stale. Performances were poor, but I never thought we'd lose - we certainly didn't concede many. Under GvB, not only are the performances consistently poor - although there have been some superb tactical performances - but there's a softness to the team that wasn't there before. Even that winning run when he first arrived was lucky, in some cases: especially the last-minute penalty against Hibs to win 0-1. 

     

    Again: a better manager gets more out of this squad. 

    Definitely. In my opinion we should be finding someone while we have the draw of a few games in the Champions League to offer, and still a chance of making the Europa. It isn’t going to happen though. 
     

    The poor recruitment and mismanagement of the squad is my biggest gripe. We are terrible and recruiting creative players, our record is dire. It doesn’t seem to matter who is our manager, our lineups are invariably too defensive and lacking in flair and excitement (and relying on Kent for that proves my point). 
     

    In terms of mismanagement of the squad, our failure to sell high and buy low is endemic. We have hung onto every player possible who brought us success in Europe in 2019. 9 out of 11 who played in the 1-0 win over Feyenoord started our last game, and all but Ojo are still involved regularly. Kent and Morelos were worth something and we turned away excellent bids for them. I believe people in the club overrating them the way many fans did is probably the blame for that. 
     

    We’re now in a situation where if you look at our squad and ask where the next big sale comes from the answer is pretty much nowhere. Our starting 11 is possibly the oldest in the league. In contrast, Celtic took 2 transfer windows to assemble a squad that has several players who could realistically fetch big money at some point. 
     

     

  2. 20 hours ago, Gonzo79 said:

    I think Napoli are one of the best sides I've seen at Ibrox.  Excluding the usual play acting you'd expect from an Italian team, the way they play the game is exquisite. 

     

    They might win the group.   

    Kvaratskhelia stood out the second he touched the ball in highlights I watched before the game, his touch and control of the ball is what all wingers should aspire to. Although to be honest it’s not really something you can teach, you have it or you don’t. What I like about Napoli is that they don’t content themselves with 1 or 2 creative players the way we do (Kent 😑), something that frustrates the life out of me, they have loads of players who can dribble and create. Anyway I watched this video after the game, a joy to watch that player. 

     

     

  3. 2 hours ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:

    One for the students of overseas football...Why exactly did Gio's reign at Feyeroord come to an end? I recall some snippets and second hand tit bits from the hacks in Scotland when he was appointed but not much else. 

    He came in and had a 55 style season where he massively overachieved by winning the league and became an instant hero. He didn’t build on it at all though, finished 4th and then 3rd and played rubbish football in the process. That’s why I was concerned when we went for him, his CV was mixed at best, he did not recruit well and went backwards. Two transfer windows in here and I’ve already lost trust in his ability to improve his squad, entering yet another season with Kent undroppable due to lack of competition  was a huge mistake. With 12 months on his deal we should have been asking his agent to find a buyer. 

  4. 12 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

    I thought that it had gone away and then reoccured, but ultimately doesn't really matter.

    I don’t know, but I read their forums when we signed him and they were all talking about unfortunate off-field issues that have hampered his progress, and that he wouldn’t get in their team now anyway. 

  5. 8 minutes ago, Nevermind said:

    Yup, Kent needing back up is how teams punish us. Whenever he makes a brainless run, it requires players to cover the gaps, the same gaps celtic know to exploit. It would be fine if there was a purpose or end product but there isn't. It's time to move him on and play as a team.

    I’ve always said about Kent that I’d just prefer an inverted winger with more technique, who has close control when he comes inside and can one-twos, chipped through balls etc. We saw some great examples of that from Napoli last night, the Georgian’s player ball control was a joy to watch. But Jota has proved that there are guys out there within our range who have that skill set. That Georgian was picked up by Rubin Kazan for 500k too, so again good scouting goes a long way. 

     

    Kent’s game for me has always been mostly about pace, causing chaos, work rate. 

  6. 9 minutes ago, Nevermind said:

    Kent's game has been sussed. Sprints down the wing then cuts inside. Doesn't know how to deal with double marking and always needs back up. 

    What I find is that when he runs inside he doesn’t have a plan and just runs into trouble. Ball control is an issue too, makes it easy to tackle him. 

  7. 5 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

    I think Morelos can still play a big part this season.  

     

    Kent and Kamara are nonentities.

    I was pleased with Morelos last night, and I’m not his number one fan. He showed desire and generally played well. Still missed chances that Colak might have scored and had some ropey passes though. 

  8. 49 minutes ago, der Berliner said:

    As I said before, send Ridvan and Borna out on the left flank and lets see what happens. For the love of the game I cannot understand why Kent in this mode is kept on the field week after week.

    It doesn’t say much for our recruitment that Kent is still virtually undroppable due to the fact that his competition is Scott Wright, a left back, Fashion Sakala and Matondo. Granted, Lawrence is injured, but we’ve needed more quality in the position for years. 

  9. 2 minutes ago, der Berliner said:

    Since my sound was off, hence I only noted Kent in the last couple of minutes ... which came as no great surprise (including that he was still on).

    Kent lost the ball countless times. Generally struggled with the level but found Barisic’s overlapping runs a few times. 

  10. It’s been a very positive first half. We’re lacking in quality when it comes to the final third as usual, but the team as a whole are playing well and making a game out of this. I’d be thinking about giving opportunities to Colak, Matondo or Fashion Jnr at some point early in this second half. 

  11. 23 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

    I only listed those without a job. 

    Sorry yes so Knutsen wouldn’t apply, but Stankovic recently resigned so he is a freebie. I had a look at the Serbian league table in the years before and after his appointment and Red Star’s points tally jumped 20-30 and they started regularly scoring 100+ goals. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.