plgsarmy

I got notification that I have one through the CCCS.

Will the site be running a poll re voting?

Numbers are available but not names for the reason that Bluedell has stated.

I'd need to have a look at the list of life members of both organisations and see the number of duplicates before I could assess that. No one has both lists at the moment. However, if a member approached us to request a refund it could be considered but I'd probably deduct £10 membership fee for every year they've been a life member. That could be a solution.

It was my understanding that there is already a group representing disabled fans that meet monthly with the Club to discuss all their issues and looking for ways to improve facilities. If I'm wrong then I'm sorry.

I thought he was excellent today apart from his shooting.

BR was set up in a different way from Gersave but let's just say that the figure that BH gave isn't far off. That would make sense as I know who it came from. It's just over 1100.

The key phrase is 'to my knowledge'. The auditors got the Gersave bank statements and a bank reconciliation was done. I kept a spreadsheet which was updated monthly showing exactly how much each person contributed.

I'm on here as an individual and not representing the RST. The view I gave was my own partly but if four organisations' members vote for it and one doesn't then I think it will go ahead and will be popular with the wider support. The proposal will be available as soon as it's ready. Do people really expect me to leak details?

Thanks for confirming what I suspected.

Because it pisses you off when I don't Alan.

Bruce, it's nowhere near that as I'm sure you know. A lot of people bought Community Shares outright rather than paid them up. I know you thought I was having a dig at RF by saying that but I wasn't. It's inevitable that people will drop off in these things because a great number didn't join up because they had a great belief in fan ownership. It was because many of them felt helpless around January last year and wanted to help get rid of the corrupt board and help the club get back to where we belong. Hence the reason to look at a group that has other options rather than shareholding.

That's not correct. It's under 9,000 now.

Thanks Zappa. In addition I have experience of the MO of some of those standing who have a history of throwing their toys out the pram if they don't get their own way.

Nobody on here plays for Rangers, it doesn't stop them having an opinion.

No I'm not.

I suppose the question is who did he discuss it with?

It amuses me because certain people who used it as a selling point are now saying it should be 95% spent on shares.

I don't get the relevance of your quote.

I assume they will remain as a separate group.

Three from RST, three from RF, two from Association, two from Assembly and two from the RFB.

It would be like bringing out a book before the end has been written.

Why not wait for the final proposal?

You'd almost think that this was being put about by people against the new group. Luckily I can confirm that the figures are wrong. What amuses me though is when RF was being set up we were told that it was so much more flexible than just buying shares.

Alan, it wasn't so much what you did (although I think you were out of order). It was that you went online and bragged about what you did. You are your own worst enemy.