WorthingBear91

If he turned all of them down what club would he be holding out for, only one I can see is PSG considering he played for them

I think a better manager will get a tune out of these players they are playing bad but they are not bad players, just look at Rabbi last season to now maybe some of them just need time and better tactics to get a rhythm going. Beale must go it is untenable the fans have turned even the more level headed ones no one has faith he can quickly turn it around, if he was at a club with less pressure I think he could turn it around but this is Rangers it must be instant wins and challenging for the title not 3 defeats in 7 he knew the score when he joined.

I know, but he will be content with a 2-1 defeat at least then he can use the 10 men excuse.

I think beale will shut up shop now and defend what he has

Rangers 2 - 1 Aberdeen FGS Lundstram

Rangers 1 - 0 Livingston FGS Roofe

Spot on, it is proud achievement to have to so few managers over 150 years. I want every manager to succeed and turn it around when we have bad spells, but beale is not getting the best out of them and I agree the rot and dissent might have been sowed after the Celtic game maybe before, and if so he will not turn it around once the players have made their minds up the manager is done unless he has outstanding youth players to fill their spots he will have to hope the players will do their job and stick by his ideas.

Maybe good for Europe against much better teams who will dominate the ball but domestically we need more bodies up the pitch.

That was a dire watch, we won but my god that was some boring football very slack in parts and I agree thank god for Butland.

Rangers 2 - 0 Motherwell FGS Tav

Hopefully Cantwell not being there and taking all the responsibility of doing thing's on the pitch makes those who drift though games wake up and take some of the burden. We need 11 players who view it as their responsibility to alter the game. For me Cantwell is the total opposite of what I thought he was when he arrived he has drive ability and aggression for me he is the future captain he is someone who leads by example.

St Johnstone 0 - 0 Rangers FGS Dessers

Winning trophies in two different countries plus the afc with Australia is experienced in my book how many managers can say they have won titles in two countries and a continental trophy with a national team. For Gallardo who knows if he would come or not but I was using him as an example there must be managers of similar ilk around the world, we should have a department at Rangers who look at managers around the world their style of play, man management, pressures at previous jobs, budget they have worked with, success and availability and constantly be scouring everywhere not just when we hit a major problem then we start searching.

They got it right with Ange he had won things in his managerial career his style of football was non stop pressing for basically all of his games, how is this unrealistic. Marcelo Gallardo is a proven winner at river and his style of play employs high pressings why is this to much to ask for.

I think we should always have a list of potential replacements for managers and players and constantly keep it updated.

He would not come to Rangers, he is also doing well with the national team and he would not come to a club he has a disdain for. We need an experienced winner who has won trophies and has overcome difficult spells in their career plus a good style of play that gets the fans out their seats, we need aggressive non stop pressings everything must be done with intensity.

No I think he is done. I would get someone in now ! I normally would give managers time to rectify poor performances but I just see Beales football as to defensive against similar level teams we need a manager who will play aggressive pressing football I don't see that enough under beale and I don't think he will change.

Would you sack him ? Or do you think he can turn it around and get fans back onside ?

Same old waffle about creating lots of chances and failing to take them, I wanna know why we were so passive in the first half and why we are so woeful at finishing.

Spot on you can see glimpses of quality in these players but not enough quality consistently in their performances, Butland is the only one who so far who has improved the first team.

We were far to passive first half

We are playing narrow but they are cutting through us make it make sense, giving them so much of the ball only works if they are creating zero opportunities but that's not working, this is utter shit why have we become so defensive playing teams.

Most of the time he turns up for these games when others don't, I think this is most aggressive team in terms of pressing and workrate Beale can go with bar sterling not seen enough of him to know. We need to get in their faces back each other up hunt in packs and when we win the ball keep it fast and simple and show themselves for the ball the very basics it kill teams, this Celtic team are in the same situation as us they are creating chances but not converting them their defence is leaky and their manager is also on the precipice with one major defeat, we need to get in their faces get the crowd going give them no opportunity to play. If we win I think this will derail their season they already distrust Rodgers and only accept him back on the premise he is a proven winner but if he loses the fans will be baying for his head and I don't think the Celtic board will part with cash this early in a season to get rid of rodgers, I am calling it this result is season defining it will lift one can base and depress another for months.