Gonzo79

UEFA sell the rights. It's on the Viaplay and Scottish National Team YouTube channels, so easy enough to watch if you have an online device.

Is this your go to argument for anyone who criticises a former manager? 🤣 And it's of course. 'Off course' would mean it's not longer on the course.

I observed an admitted former bondage trouser wearer telling me to believe someone partly on the basis that they are a Commander of the Order of the British Empire, which was fun. Punk's not dead. 🤪

Everyone seems to agree new blood is needed at the upper echelons of the club. The remaining arguments are just folk getting all hot and bothered for the sake of it.

I was accused of 'trolling'. People have every right to point out flaws In arguments or accusations. 🙂

Trolling is getting put on the list of overused words, along with toxic, omnishambles and literally. They're so ubiquitous they've become meaningless.

Agreed. And for the record, you'd need to pay me a tidy sum to attend one of these chat things with ex-players and managers. All sounds very boring.

gullible adjective uk /ˈɡʌl.ə.bəl/ us /ˈɡʌl.ə.bəl/ easily deceived or tricked, and too willing to believe everything that other people say: The incident, with the tea lady, at McDiarmid Park occurred on 26th February and he became Liverpool manager on 16th April. So, according to Souness, the incident that pushed him "over the edge" occurred about seven weeks prior to the announcement - aye right.

Not EPL but I smiled when I saw Stockport (good guys) beat Wrexham (bad guys) today. A good result for the UK.

Souness isn't someone whose opinion we should be paying a great deal of attention to, in my opinion. He's yesterday's news (and he didn't think twice about leaving Rangers in 1991).

So, a 'we're doing stuff behind the scenes, honest' statement wouldn't actually be of any use to anyone. Who'd have thunk it.

So, we're now thinking the board members aren't just sitting, twiddling their thumbs due to the lack of updates about recruitment. That's progress.

So, from a common sense perspective, it might be best for the board to keep things under wraps until someone is officially appointed.

Imagine taking time to appoint suitable candidates and not updating customers (how they view us) at every turn, even if that might negatively impact the recruitment process (I doubt any candidates would want their names in the public domain, especially with some of the whining brats in our support).

In the current climate (at Rangers and in Scottish football), yes. I have no idea what the board are trying to do behind the scenes but they must be attempting to rectify the lack of staff in important roles.