Bill

This is a ride we’re going to enjoy beyond the power of words to express. They may very well eat themselves alive n their anxiety

I think what he’s hiding behind is that being anti-Rangers isn’t in the formal SNP manifesto, therefore they can’t be. So, no matter how many SNP MPs, MSPs, councillors, etc take a swipe a Rangers, he can continue pretending the SNP isn’t the squalid hun-hating circus we all know it is. As I said earlier, it’s bizarre.

I suppose you would have to convince yourself of that nonsense in order to take the stance you do ... but that only makes you look daft and I'm delighted every time I see someone erode their credibility with this fatuous denial. Cheers ?????????

But that's the whole point here. It IS representative of the SNP as a party. Denying that central issue just makes you look deceitful, most of all towards yourself.

Why are we still talking about Graeme Murty? That ship sailed and won't be returning.

How can any Rangers fan vote for them. It’s bizarre.

Rangers achievements next season are likely to be influenced less by Steven Gerrard and more by our ability to generate new investment. I'm now much more interested in the prospect of new investors replacing Paul Murray and Brian Scott than by any decision by Steven Gerrard. I wouldn't mind both of course.

Even if Murphy did say what's written in that article, it's hardly anything you or me didn't know anyway.

It could be as simple as a conflict of interest with a new investor, that might get have no connection to Rangers and relate only to other business interests of the various parties.

I thought the UK Corporate Governance Code was intended for LSE listed companies only.

I wish them well but let's be honest, they'll beat themselves long before anyone else has to.

I reckon if you asked a cross section of the Rangers support today what they think of SDM the response would be resoundingly negative and would rightly reflect on his part in the disaster of the last six years. However and leaving that judgement on past events to one side, do you think the response would be the same if you asked the support whether or not they would welcome him back if he brought £50m with him for the restoration of Rangers as the number one club in Scotland?

What? I could have said accountants are the spawn of Satan, the book keepers of hell but, sensitive to other members, I obviously refrained from doing so.

Believe me, if you don't know then for the sake of your sanity, withdraw your question

I think it's more likely to be the polar opposite and related to ability or willingness to commit to a minimum investment in a new share issue. The bar may simply be too high for some.

No idea I'm afraid. If I did I'd be at the bookies preparing to make a small fortune. All possible I suppose.

I won't miss Paul Murray any more than the other Murrays we've endured over the years. I knew Paul during his 3i days and I can think of few people I'd less like to be running a business. Accountants are like car mechanics - they know lots about how things work under the bonnet but you wouldn't hire them in place of Lewis Hamilton.

It's becoming clear the changes afoot go well beyond the appointment of Steven Gerrard. Begin to doubt Dave King will be in the chairman's role for long.

There are huge difficulties here for the average bheastly bigot. Having spent decades as wannabe Koppites, they're now faced with having to regard Liverpool as the enemy. It's not easy being a bheast you know. Will YNWA have to be sacrificed pro tem?

No

It's unlikely but I wonder if he has ambition to own part of the club? Or could he be the choice of future investors? The world of Rangers is so convoluted that anything is possible.

So rude. So little class

I don’t know, is it? ❤️

You don’t say! Did I offend you, flower?

Every day is made that much better when I neither see nor think about Graham Spiers. It's a shame to have this day spoiled by having him held up in front of me.