I've always viewed Barisic as one of those players we signed at a time we couldn't afford anyone better and who only found a berth at Rangers because our chaotic management merry go round prevented us from improving the squad as we should have done. Otherwise Barisic would surely have been long gone. That he survived for 6 years is testament to the wasted opportunities this club has endured.
There's nothing in those rules that persuades me the authorities should have any say in how many Rangers fans should give up their opportunity to buy a seat to oppositions supporters.
I can't see it's any business of the authorities. The authorities don't pay for our stadium or compensate our ST holders. By what measure is this anything to do with the authorities?
Tavernier's achievements at Rangers seems to be in somewhat inverse proportion to the achievements of the team as a whole. Probably just coincidence but worth some careful thought ๐
I think it's very unlikely that all NEH costs are borne entirely by NEH and any assumption of costs on the NEH accounts is likely to be skewed in the first year of trading and progressive over time. Whatever the truth of it, I'm guessing these first figures are very unlikely to reflect the underlying viability of NEH.
It's always possible that Helander has been playing under a disclaimer since his recovery. It could be a means of mitigating risk to the Danish club until they could achieve some kind of assurance about his medical status - a risk that Rangers couldn't take.
Could it be that there are only 4 or 5 staff permanently and fully employed by NEH and that temporary/itinerant staff are charged as services? Just speculating because, as you say, there's no way NEH operates on that kind of wages cost.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.