bmck

Many problems on said forum. Don't blame for being disenchanted with it.

i choose not to post there myself for similar reasons - its just that the specific wording included far too many decent bears to leave publicly on another rangers supporting forum.

he's free to express these views privately and has a copy of the edited portion for these purposes.

spot on and why Rangers don't have the balls to come out with such statments is beyond me.............

EXACTLY. the Trust does this without turning a profit off the supporters - we aren't even defended by those whose wages we pay.

whatastatement. who writes these? top marks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=503q0B182j4 - first half

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gp1KuDs92c - second half

(yes you're right btw)

is there any links for the highlights yet?

the op should be an article on the site.

I'm hoping a friend of mine will be doing a complete break down of the accounts for Gersnet over the next few weeks.

will this include how much of murray's 'own money' that he has, in the minds of the majority of fans, put in?

thought you were talking about me an all.

Ban Barry for posting something positive :devil:

johnny man, i think i'm going to have to doubly ban myself, because this is from a chelsea fan's match review:

The Friday evening and Saturday saw a brilliant spirit of friendship reinforced between the two sets of fans, with those following Chelsea being warmly received in every Rangers pub and club they were seen in.

 

Through this webpage, the many patrons of BAWA.net who travelled to Glasgow would like to extend their thanks to all Rangers fans for their hospitality and we here at Chelsea look forward to the next fixture between the two clubs.

:D

we might have expected some of the new players to make positive comments about there being such a large crowd for friendlies - but perhaps the comments of darcheville and ceullar were more positive than expected. i mean, they thought the atmosphere at the games was excellent, so they're going to be in for a shock come old firm day (though less so ceullar who's played against us in europe).

but even our next oppponent's manager, who has no need to be particularly concerned or unconcerned about atmosphere said:

Halilovic said: "I watched Rangers' match with Chelsea with my team but I wish I hadn't!

 

"Rangers were brilliant - I didn't believe they could be that good.

 

"The other aspect that shocked me was the atmosphere - it sounded tremendous. This is going to be a very difficult match for us."

so perhaps we're not so bad after all. :cheers: to us. to our detractors.

In other words, we're fooked

 

Cammy F

cammy you keep putting my pessimism in the most succinct form. please stop!

brilliant. just brilliant. cheers fraser.

the problem is that nothing is ontologically offensive - so, ultimately, what is deemed offensive is whatever the person(s) with the most power decide.

All our custodian wants to do is suck their cock and bend over and get it royally from the rear (unless they attack him personally)

i raised this point in one of my articles. i'm amazed your average fan cant see it.

And SJ statement was factually incorrect to the detriment of OUR clubs reputation - ie HE LIED

yup, thats what i meant. a shocking state of affairs.

i think the problem is that he's factually incorrect to the detriment of our fans reputation.

cammy, your piece captured the sense of pessimism i'm doing my best to suppress...

del, cheers for that, and dont listen to cammy about the painkillers. we know if they go anywhere its barrywards.

can someone record it? i dont have the internet dans le hoose.

When you put it like that it it boosts my confidence for the coming year. Good analysis .

agreed. might be worth making into an article calscot.

are these games live on the tv?

got an e-mail from rangers saying the ajax game isnt.

Disagree. The downfall started with wasting money on crap foreigners. Now we're having to try and rectify that by buying young scottish talent.

i agree with this. my only reservation was specifically about whittaker - everytime i've seen him he gets caught vastly out of position ala ricksen. dont think he's worth that money.

naismith's worth every penny though.

yeah. we'll have to wait and see.

though i have to say 1.5 million for whittaker is beyond a joke.

I wouldn't have thought so....

 

I still expect Naismith and at least one more - probably Whittaker.

even with these two players, once you factor in the players going out, he'll still have spent nowhere near the reported 10 million.

do you reckon the trust would be happy with these two players and no-one else?

i'm not convinced we've purchased, or are going to purchase, more than 2-3 first team players.