Jump to content

 

 

bmck

  • Posts

    5,602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by bmck

  1. Well said Cammy!...To me the CL is a side show...We have got get this feckin league title.

     

    i look at it the other way - the cl is the only true stage rangers can be represented at. we're that size of club. we should presuppose league victory.

  2. I was there at the start of August, it's still a fair bit off being finished. I think there was a completion date of 2012 being bandied about.

     

    i love the fact that they turned down all sorts of foreign investment and its being built entirely on free donated labour as a form of penance and whatnot.

  3. qaulity over quantity m8. by your reasoning colshy would have contributed msot to the forum :D

     

     

    P.s Thinking back to the members that were around when I first started on here, what ever happend to Stuart ? :confused:

     

    Did he hand over the reigns after the gersnet.net domain name confusion ?

     

    i dont actually know. i still have a jumper of his. frankie'll know.

  4. i think the truth is that when something's being sung at a football match its less of a philosophical-ethics decision and more of a am-i-going-to-join-the-noise-or-not. i mean, i've sung 'no surrender' while believing that song to have no relevance to either my life or to football. and i still would sing it, without a moment's hesitation because its a good song, and its not singing about anything i think is immoral.

     

    but i've never sang, and never would sing, bjk. i just think its stupid, and if someone asked me why i wasnt singing it thats exactly what i'd tell them.

     

    but i dont deny other people their right to sing it, incidentally. i dont think it should be a banned song.

  5. i do think that if the offended parties do feel there is unresolved injustice then they should pursue it - and those horrified by what they've found about the case should support it. but it being continued by rangers supporters nowhere else than in a football match and on stupid banners is just pointless, self-congratulating, self-indulgence.

     

    It is also used as a taunt to Celtic, so yes it is to make our rivals look bad

     

    yeah. using someone else's misery to make your rivals look bad is pathetic. like when politicians use a death (jamie bulger's death, say) to advance their own careers (to prime ministerial success ala mr. blair).

  6. If Big Jock really cared he would have went to the Police about it and it would have been sorted

     

    its not really anything to do with anyone other than those involved and big jock himself now though, is it? i cant think of anyone for whom it is less relevant than us: or are there other examples of social injustice we sing about from the same era, or is it just the one that happens to make our rivals look bad?

     

    its pathetic.

  7. its using child abuse as an excuse for oneupmanship. anyone who would use child abuse to their own advantage is scum.

     

    if they really cared about the kids involved they would be taking this to somewhere appropriate - like the council, or the police, or whatever.

  8. looking again

     

    I think Barca are the 2nd top seeded team in pot 1.

    Lyon are 2nd top seed in pot 2

    Stuttgart are 3rd top seed in pot 3

    Rangers are 1st top seed in pot 4.

     

    That's an average of 2nd top seed where the expectation value is 4.5.

     

    whats it for celtic's group? or am i missing the point of these statistics?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.