bmck

At the end of the day it was a nice wee project that resulted in a better match-day experience for all.

at the end of the day, that's the important thing.

Why should one statement of fact make you overcome your apathy, if you happened to be interested which we know your not then you'd know there is far more to it than just that one fact. But as stated above if you are not interested in a thread then best not leave comment on it.

dont ask questions then moan when you get an answer. just because it's an ulster day thread doesn't mean that it's only for the people who want to celebrate our historical lineage - it's about considering the place of our lineage and how worthwhile it is. if getting answers to your own questions in that context is too much for you, best not to leave your questions in the first place.

spiers is an idiot. anyone who thinks he is clever isn't clever. he's a self-serving sophist - not even an amusing one. the worse thing you can do is get upset about him though. he's like an irrating wee guy.

Unless it has passed your notice, but this thread is about Ulster Day and the clubs links to Ulster. I was iterating that Ulster has more to it than the paramilitary side.

actually, no. someone said they couldn't be arsed with irish links (and ulster day in general), and you seemed to think that one/two of our clubs founder's mother was from ulster should somehow overcome his apathy.

One of our founders mother was from Ulster.

 

How does that sit with you?

not addressed to me, but, really, who cares where our founder's mother is from?

Ah, but the ruling is based on perception apparently...

 

Nacho is a catholic but the Celtic supporters will see him as just another DOB. Sectarian irony is surely a PC term?

this is the absurdity its descending to - i had to read that about 5 times to get the full meaning out it.

we have catholics who hate catholics who're orangemen

we have secularists who think they are protestants who hate catholics who aren't catholics but are plastic stereotypes of them

we have catholics who arent catholics who think singing should be tailored to their sensitivies as catholics who are not catholics

we have celtic supporters who think they're oppressed and anti-establishment while running to any establishment who'll pander to their irrationality

it's all too much, i just cant make it sense of it anymore. i think i'll stick to watching the fitbaw.

So Lennon and Novo have been taking similar levels of abuse, but only one is described as sectarian.

to be fair, nacho's probably catholic, he's spanish. it cant be sectarian. the trick's in the sleight of hand that says there's differing ratings of thuggary - sectarian/random thug, all the same.

The protest isn't for the right to sing a song, it's for parity when reporting incidents that involve ALL clubs in Scotland.

i dont give a flying f**k what the bbc say. i cant be arsed with them at all.

BBC Scotland have played a large part in tarring 'your' club with the sectarian brush without the desire and will to address other teams problems too.

i cant be tarred as sectarian because i'm not sectarian. if anyone thinks i am, it's their problem.

I don't understand why you aren't concerned because you don't have a TV. Regardless of whether you have a TV or not this company is hellbent on blackening the name of Rangers.

the point is that the bbc doesn't get any of my custom, so it can do what the hell it likes. cancel your subscription if you hate it so much.

Are you telling us you don't care?

im not sure who the 'us' is here, but yes, what i'm telling you is that i dont care if the bbc thinks i'm a bigot. i only like spooks, anyway, and even that's went down hill.

football isn't politics for me. i just enjoy watching my team win. i know what the media's like and i find it all just extremely boring.

like i said, i appluad you for daring to stand up for what you think's right; its not something i think is important enough to protest about.

the irish government chose (as it does) to interfere in the politics of other countries - the bbc's reporting that. i'm just glad we're not like celtic supporters and dont feel the need to run to every authority we can find and beg for our view to be championed.

^ dont you think you're just a little worked up? it's annoying having this sort of stupidity go on, but there's no grand injustice. you're not oppressed. them asking for it to be banned says more about them, really.

If ma granny had baws

agreed this manager-cant-tell-future as managerial-defect is too much. he gambled that we would, as we should, have had the players to be kaunas. he lost the gamble; he cant be blamed for not knowing the futre.

i couldnt be arsed protesting to sing a song i'm ambivalent about. im also not that fussed who the bbc stands up for as i dont have a tv.

good on you though. i like it when people are bold enough to say this rather than that. let us know how it goes.

It's down to the timing of the cashflows. I'll be doing a detailed commentary on the accounts over the next week or so, and will explain it further.

many thanks

i dont understand how we can make a profit and increase in debt.

I don't think fighting smart is weakness

indeed. the celtic fans are smart enough to see the ground's moved slightly - with everyone so sensitive about pluralism/multiculturalism they realise they only have to shout "racist" to get everyone's attention.

crap, but true. we need to be smarter than crying and shouting "injustice" even though it really is.

wow. i was quite quick to see the RSA as essentially on-the-payroll-doers-of-murrays-bidding a while ago - but standing down at a time where the football's looking more optimistic after there being a perfect time, if you were looking for an easy out, over hte last few years, is a brave/bold step.

wonder what the club will say.

thats great; my wee maw first went there regularly in the 60s with her brothers, and its her 60th next week, so they're being used as part of a photo album full of this sort of things. really thanks again.

that's just so class. thanks man.

Seems to me that throughout history and round the world there are many male garments that are not trousers.

 

Clothes are after all just garments to cover the body and are almost arbitrarily gender assigned.

 

The kilt is obviously gender assigned to men and I find it strange that you think anything that does not agree with the recent Western convention of men wearing trousers, as feminine.

 

I think it's obvious you have issues when you are afraid of male attire because you think it could be mistaken for women's clothing even when few knowledgeable people would make that mistake. And I doubt many blokes who enjoy dressing as a woman would choose to wear a kilt to fulfil their fantasies.

 

Perhaps you need to relax and find more confidence in your own masculinity - and Scottishness...

 

You seem to be trying far too hard to show how you are more Scottish and more manly than everyone else.

this is just utter pish. make your point with out petty amateur psychology. address the arguments, not the person.

that's just amazing. many thanks indeed. if you have any of the mid-60s early-70s from that'd be great.

lads, ladies - anyone got any pics of the old ibrox?

had a look about but couldnt see any good ones.

aye, this is the way it should work. we're their target market - it's better they take us into account for us both, i reckon.

Fixed...

it wasn't so much fixed as edited. you've thieved half the title.

:admin:

http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/298634824?-11344

if you want to read it, it's good for us to do it via the above link as it puts us up the rankings.

aye, all nice and done. should magic itself onto newsnow too.

nice one!! cheers.