bmck

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rangers/5410544.stm

its quoted in the evening times too.

... says Jeremy Clement. at least confidence isn't low in some parts of the camp! - http://www.tribalfootball.com/article.php?id=13630

its certainly offensive to people who walk alone.

on yersel marv.

i think the problem with centripal politics is that its so boring. to me its just a different kind of oppression, that of monotony. there's no marches, no revolutions. people don't believe in anything. it has a numbing inevitability about it. for me while the worst is always found at the extremes, so to is the best.

phew, your a saviour - that saves me robbing a few grannies this month for dole cheques!!!!

well, they say that if everyone pays 100% tax, and get all they need to live from the government, then everyone is equal. everyone does their job for the benefit of everyone in society (doctors get "paid" the same as cleaners, ie: nothing), but get food/clothes etc from the government.

communism is far left, fascism is far right. both are controlling philosophies, the far left in the name of "equality" for the people (everyone pays 100% tax, and get all they need from the government), and the far right in terms of dictatorships, usually highly nationalistic (ie: the nazi's). both deny individual liberty, but generally "in the name of" opposing things.

i dont like stone island gear, generally, either. like gaz, it just reminds me of hooliganism. despite knowing that plenty of people wear it who are not hooligans, it just isn't for me. in saying that, i'm not sure what kind of clothes i like, its been that long since i bought any. i'm virtually in rags. i just spent all my money on books again

they'd need to be some rockets to get all the way over to that side of israel!

there's a suprise. so you dont think there's any chance we could have improved by then?

so its less racist at non-spl games? heh.

rod and papac, but preferably a new signing instead of rod, leaving himself and svensson to fight for the free place. i still think svensson will come good though.

interesting draw. wouldn't mind going to france.

ihmo, anyone who believes trustingly the opinions of some random person who writes in deserves their ignorance.

i think mr. murray is right on this issue - just dont read or buy the paper.

get a petition with this content going, and i'll gladly sign it.

and quite rightly too.

i agree, both svensson and plg should be given more time.

it doesn't make sense to me.

dunn, you talk abject pish. anyone who isn't a reactionist, short-termist, will see that plg is the right man to take us forward.

i agree with both of you.

i think all this talk of poor tactics etc is simply misplaced. when i looked at the game today i saw a team of largely accomplished players (in key positions), against a team of largely unaccomplished players. no amount of tactics can change that. the truth is that even if our younger players will one day be better than the seasoned pro's that celtic have (and i think they will), its going to take time. my assessment mcgregor - did fine, wasn't at fault for either goal hutton - unaccomplished, poor distribution, but good energy smith - see hutton papac - altogether decent game, didnt look out of place rodriguez - decent in patches, just not very commanding ferguson - absolute drifter, needs matches, but was entirely absent adam - rash, unaccomplished, will be a good player in time, but not the finished article hemdani - quietly effective, but not commanding burke - again, largely uninvolved, poor final product prso - our best player as usual, a seasoned grafter boyd - does nothing outside the box, unlucky not to score remember, celtic had two clear cut chances and scored them, we had two clear cut chances and hit the bar and was cleared off the line. we just need time, imho.

http://www.uefa.com/competitions/UEFACup/news/Kind=1/newsId=458539.html?cid=rssfeed&att=index This means Ferguson/Hemdani midfield. Which is unfortunate, i think.