gaspard

Check your dates 26 You may have been going to Ibrox for longer than you think Aug 61 or Aug 62

Bill, I have never questioned the integrity of our current board, nor have I smeared anyone nor consider myself a victim of anything. Notwithstanding that, I know share prices are variable, I only question why they are 20p to 1 group of fans last month, 25p to another this month and again 20p to group 1 next month. Now that surely is a reasonable question? Maybe not so much for a £500 investor but remember the top limit on this issue was £100,000 and if I were considering going in at that level I'd be asking for a degree of clarification Again you are spot on "buy or don't buy" I didn't.

Tuppence worth I get all the reasoning in respect of the directors and others investing large sums and the associated risks, that's fine and a good argument in the 20 v 25 debate. What I cannot come to terms with is the recent and ongoing sale of tranches to C1872 at 20p v the 25% increase to the rest of us. I also think the issue price aught to have been published at the point of asking for registration.

Off work on the sick Now sacked

Looks like I'm lined up for dross as well, never know i might bump into you.

Have they "put over 2 million" into the club? I thought they bought most of their holding from sports direct and refused to participate in the last 3 club issues despite being invited by Rangers to do so. I'm receptive to correction if mistaken.

Alternatively Follow Rangers allows the member to transfer all the shares they have bought whilst part of their collective into their own name at any time. I'm not a member of either group nevertheless comparing the 2 collective models, if I should in the future decide that a supporters collective would be a benefit to Rangers, I would find FR a much more attractive proposition. If the group no longer appeals for whatever reason then you have the option to bail out with your investment. 1872 of course do not offer that option, hence the predicament some members must be faced with just now, I know guys who just want to terminate their involvement but feel compelled to remain given their financial contributions to date. The reality is that every member will have to abandon their investment at some point. Mortality is unavoidable. Which makes a bit of a mockery of the 1872 legacy membership, a legacy for who? Dave Kings kids by the looks of things.

Anyone still funding this organisation is no friend of Rangers

just shows that if you put 2-0 Rangers and Morelos FGS every game you win the league

Agree, most of us vaccinated now, time to bin the masks.

What Robertson didn't say is that this proposal is in fact plan B. The original proposal was an expanded league 2, The swifts and young bheasts joining along with 2 from the Highland and 2 from the lowland. There would be no promotion for the big 2 but there was guaranteed payments from us and them to the Scottish league along with other contractual incentives. It was considered a goer earlier this year, but obviously something has happened to kibosh that model and the lowland version is now being offered.

competed in 4 comps that season, only lost 4 games. And won zip. That season cannot replicate so stand easy.

Well, thats debatable accurate solidarity should have been 0-2, the same score as 1921. Your prediction of 1-2 looks suspiciously like a pessimist jumping on my jinx bandwagon.

Martyr

Rangers 0 Separate Entity 2 Odd reasoning afoot, but here's my thinking, 100 years ago, season 1920/21 we won the league with ease, lost only 1 game the whole campaign, 0-2 v them at Ibrox. Since I stumbled across this stat I have been troubled that history could repeat a century later. So, by hereby predicting the repetition I have jinxed the probability of it occurring.

Why not? Against the sheep they were kicking things that didn't move and got away with it

Really? Thought st johnstone had a decent go and got what they deserved. They had 43% possession, won 7 corners and quite a few goal attempts. Hardly 11 behind the ball. In fact, as I'm sure you'll recall at one point they had 11 men in front of the ball.

2-0 Morelos

0-1 Itten

1-0 Morelos

3-2 us FGS Goldson

Anyone, whatever their race, creed or status who exposes themselves on global social media should either accept that they will be subject to abuse or remove themselves from the platform. The world is full of nutters that is undeniable and unchangeable. Nobody in their right mind can condone anonymous abuse but to try and silence every crackpot on the planet is farting against thunder. Death threats always make me laugh, often taken as the most serious, but do credible assassins normally give advance warnings? I think not. If you expose your life to the planet, then you should be savvy enough to ignore the nutters. If not then don't do it and deny them the facility.

2-0 FGS Wright

Tramps 1 Champs 3 FGS Goldson