gaspard

had a look at the launch, just made me maudlin, but if they came with a time machine and a gastric band............

Its also true though that the sales of the shirt will directly impact the quality of those that wear it.

Can't comment on constitutional liabilities, but I do remember Leslie Deans, on his bbc interview, saying that any compensation due to hearts would ultimately come from the member clubs.

According to Leslie Deans the action would be served against the SPFL but the members would be liable for any financial court awards.

Should they win those optimistic figures, it's the members who would be liable, which includes Rangers of course. Something to bear in mind .

Personally I think there's nothing wrong in cutting and pasting an article from the gutters on here. Allows other folk to read without giving them the clicks they desperately want. Much better than posting links.

It was indeed

2 season deal 19/20 price 1100 no vat 2 seasons 2200 New deal 2900 + vat 3480 So that's 1280 pounds increase

Frozen for some, up significantly for others. Bar72

When? Thanks for the suggestions folks, I have all the record books, unfortunately I'm away from home just now and have no access to my library.

Substitutions I believe were introduced at the start of season 1966/67 and I have tried to find who was our first sub deployed, have found this bit of info; regarding the opening LC fixtures on 13th Aug. (We played Hivs at Ibrox) Records show 10 substitutes were used in six of the matches and the unfortunate Jim Clunie of St Mirren was the first to be replaced through injury by Archie Gemmill in the match against Clyde Don't know however if Rangers used a sub that day or when we first used the facility, would appreciate some help from the GN historians and statisticians. Thanks in advance.

£341 hike, for a shitey pie and a programme, I'm frankly astonished that the club would indroduce this at this time of fear and uncertainty. very disappointed indeed, that increase is way beyond anything i anticipated.

no guesses required, he's a ST holder at the chamber of secrets.

If you read my post carefully I wasn't giving the players a hard time, neither was I speculating as to what they may or may not have been proposed. My point was that, as you correctly say, a deferral is not wage cut and will eventually have to be reimbursed. Good on them if it helps the club at this juncture but I won't be getting too excited about their grand gesture.

I concur, whilst any measure that helps the club through this period is welcome, I get the impression that the deferral has been received by some as some sort of selfless altruistic gesture by the high earners, as you say it is nothing like that. I wouldn't presume to suggest what anyone should do regarding their financial affairs, but I do try to look at things realistically and a wage deferral for those that can afford to survive few months sitting on their bums watching netflix warrants no round of applause from me, it's what I would expect in these extraordinary times, nothing more.

Dundee, show how it should be handled, excellent statement https://dundeefc.co.uk/news/club-statement-23/

I may be wrong, but I believe the last goal scored in front of a 100,000 + crowd in British Football

can see nervousness being a factor, early goal will relieve the pressure and we could go on to a comfortable victory, however a prolonged deadlock could compound our fragility. 0-3 FGS Goldson or 0-0 and more boos

from your response, i assume that you are witnessing these moronic/ancient chants at ibrox? (albeit at a distance) somewhat surprised as, as far as i was aware these indiscretions have been an issue at away fixtures.

problem, is our players don't know what a big game is, last night was a big game, every unglamorous league fixture, is a big game. Braga was not a big game, Europe is a seasonal bonus nothing more.

unlike you, who turned the TV off during the match. NS

Almost everyone, but what about, rangers first foreign player, the first foreigner to playin an old firm game, the only ranger to spend ww2 in a concentration camp, I raise you, Carl "skomager"Hansen

High ground? Wouldn't matter a jot what we sing, there's not a hope of rangers getting any moral standing in this bitter wee land. We have lost the establishment, there is no morality in north Britain, only grievance, spite and state propaganda. We are swimming in filth , and some folk are getting hot under the collar about a song that mentions a WW1 volunteer regiment?

I'm really not that eloquent or articulate enough to convey what I mean, but in a nutshell, I tried to say, the bias may be subconscious, then it's not overt corruption, but it may well be conscious, then it is indeed corrupt. Either way we lose, but imo we need to get used to it, our pseudo-nation Orwellian micro state, that we have allowed ourselves to become, will continue to regard rangers and everything associated with us as an anathema to all the forces of goodness and fairness that will save us from the devil in Westminster, that mind state prevails in every level of society governance, from the Edinburgh school debating chamber to the imbeciles at hampden. There are enemies everywhere, gersneters don't have to look very far to see the trojan horses.