Super_Ally

With the email knowledge (can sign up 2 from one email) just signed it for 3 of my family members too.

I for one was against the idea, but since the request has come from the club itself I'm comfortable with that and fully respect the decision. Hope the game is on RTV or Sky.

Respect for that post.

If you dont get a positive response here try FF? Busiest Gers website so best chance of finding a buyer? And they allow a ticket exchange on there at face value.

Just bought 3 tickets.

 

First game for a couple of years, going with son and grandson [first time at Ibrox]

 

First game I saw at Ibrox was against Stirling Albion 58 years ago.

 

As excited now as I was then.

Always assumed you were a lot younger than you must be. Hope you all enjoy it.

Cant see this but if its true there are far better options even within the online fanbase.

STB may be younger and not long in the tooth. But he appears more open minded and not judging something before its happened.

I think it is a credibility issue. Losing the FTT case was a big blow for HMRC specially after putting Rangers into liquidation, all the publicity and the rush to judgement by the Scottish media. They now have to contend with a PF/Crown Office investigation as requested by Murray and his high-powered lawyers, an e-petition which has garnered 32k signatures in just two weeks and questions from a couple of MPs who want to ensure that they don't lose the 'blue' vote at the next election.

 

M guess is that the 'high heid yins' at the HMRC are desperate to have a result so that they can say they were right all along. It also defuses the current situation as everyone will now be waiting for the result of the appeal. And that will take around three years.

If enough pressure is applied in the right places I could see them getting the result they want, regardless if whether or not that is the right thing by law.

Look at previous appeals against us with singing in Europe. Don't get the result we desire, appeal until we do.

celtic will rake in at least £20m from their euro run. no worries money wise for them.

Of course its a worry.

That "£20mil" will no longer be felt to its full benefit as it is going to have to make up for shortfall elsewhere in their finances. Shortfall that would not be there if Rangers were still in the league. Sponsorship and TV money will be down for the SPL as a whole. Celtic's ticket sales, hospitality and all other match day income is massively down.

Sure there books will be ok this year. But that wont be as good as they would normally be with a champions league bounty. Which they may not even get every year for the next 2-3 anyway.

No not at all, I regarded it as a helpful assist, and you're having a go.

Hypocritical repetitive? That's a strange observation. Can you be more specific?

It is hypocritical of you to ask for censorship of someone else's posts on here when you got stroppy when zappa suggested your repetitive thread on the boycott (there was already one active) was unnecessary. Not too difficult really.

Who do you think you are helping?

It appears there are several bears interested in this, they can discuss it in this thread. Those who aren't interested could quite easily leave it alone without comment.

How about instead of wasting your money at Tannadice you go spend it at the next ladies game.

There's been more than one thread sticking up for boycott this thread is sticking up for something else. I posted it and it's not because of what you say. Precious? Give me a break SA

I repeat, it is the opposite side of the same argument and was completely unnecessary. Could and should have remained in the other thread and in fact is not a view any sane minded bear should be holding anyway.

My assumption was on Rangers fans attending the game win or lose. A non attendance is risky to the fact we lose the game because of the obvious, referee decisions on crowd reactions young 'Gers losing the plot because of again crowd reactions, this game is a big step forward if you'd rather not be there to push us on then that will help the opposition no doubt.

 

Pushing for a boycott might harm them but it wont help our team and I'm exasperated at your agenda.

Actually the only certainty is that a full boycott would harm DU. Not that it "might".

Attendance of our fans may or may not.

Your agenda is equally perplexing as its about more than just one little game. Its about sending a statement to the rest of Scottish football, the SPL and the sponsors.

Surely not trying to have other posters censored 54? Bit hypocritical with your repetitive thread.

This is an anti-boycott thead and I for one support it.

 

Follow follow.

It's presenting the opposite side of the same argument of other threads but once again people are getting precious about ownership of their own threads and pretend it's down to not having a conformist opinion.

..doing what?

Making an assumption on the outcome of the game based on attendance or non attendance of fans.

Amazed some cant see the bigger picture.

Completely agree on that on the assumption we lose the match, but lets say we win the match.

Have you not been doing the very same in this thread?

Take it you've never been to Tannadice while we were playing there, we get nearer 50% than 15%.

Correct. I was trying to remember what the official entitlement was supposed to be for away clubs. Thought there was an agreed percentage?

Only been to a handful of away grounds and Tannadice isn't one.

What do we get anyway? 5, 10, 15% of Tannadice.

Maybe 1-2000 tops is it?

Dont think it will be much different whether the fans are there are not, in terms of performance. Boycott is the way forward.

“Some SPL clubs are terrified of giving up something but the reality is that I had to give up something and that was TV rights.

 

“I met with Neil Doncaster last week and told him very clearly that once this agreement is finished we will not give them up again and I have already written to David Longmuir to reinforce that.

Here's our big bargaining chip.

We are the only show in town. If we stick to this it doesn't even matter if a few SFL teams join the SPL proposal.

Not quite the Geordie dancer or the mackem mover is it? Dear god.

You're right 54, and it's also worth noting that English is making out as if Lennon is against the nasty elements at their club, when in fact, he plays up to them and clearly supports them at times.

Invited the gangrene brigade to meet him about their current issues to see if he could help didn't he?

BHEASTS v Arbroath crowd: Between 8000-9000 mentioned on the radio, aye Scottish football is doing great!

Didn't read it all. In the second line he has some how crowbarred Hitler into a Rangers story. Stopped there. Don't tell me he's not trying to suggest something by doing that. Shocking.

If I could wipe one man from the history of Rangers it would be PLG so people would stop pretending that anyone other than the man himself was responsible for his exit from Ibrox due to being a really shit football manager and in fact a really poor manager of any kind with zero people skills.

Funnily enough my little brother pointed out the kick off times of a few of those games and the relatively close proximity. A late, a 3 o'clock and an early game. Involving the likes of Milwall and Chelsea fans. Like you say, busy day for the coppers.