StuGers

So are we going to expect "£10m McKay" headlines now?

Jeez, Coral have shot themselves in the foot if they are trying to use that as their defence rather than just simply stating the fact that Rangers were placed in the bottom division, not relegated. Have they been researching Celtic blogs as the case for their defence? That would easily get blown out of court with a quick search on UEFA and the SFA's site!

Quite a few sources saying the handstand part of the story is nonsense.

Hush payments, media "sponsorship", big Dermot's "running out of the country" costs, UEFA fines (though they are on a discounted scheme now).

Mr. Waddell, Rangers didn't go into into administration due to overspending. It was due to a fraudster putting the company into administration on purpose. Something that he had done previously, yet the Daily Record peddled the story of his "off the charts" wealth. WAS THAT THE TRUTH? If you took some time to look at the facts, Rangers were reducing their debt year-on-year. You don't mention that as it doesn't suit your agenda. You don't mention that in your article. WHY NOT PRINT THAT TRUTH? Now Mr. Waddell, why would any Rangers fans take your article to have any truth in it? How many retractions, corrections or even apologies have you had to issue in recent history on articles relating to Rangers or the fan's of Rangers? In fact, one of your articles made out the fans to be thugs who used their children as human shields. WAS THAT THE TRUTH? No it wasn't. It was a lie. Yet you still employ that sectarian woman. WHY SHOULD ANY RANGERS TAKE ANY LESSONS ON WHAT IS THE TRUTH FROM THE DAILY RECORD? They shouldn't. As it is full of proven lies. Time and time again.

I was surprised to see no mention at all of this in the media...

Haha Sutton you cretin. It is plain and simple: yes, there is a good chance that Keirnan gave him a dig in the stomach. What these hate filled idiots fail to see or accept though is that there is no evidence of this. The point of impact is NOT shown on any clip, therefore if he was to be found guilty it would have been based on guesswork. I think they are actually just raging as, like myself, they probably though because it was Rangers then the guilty verdict would be automatic.

But Rangers players weren't assaulted according to the press!

STV putting a ridiculous spin on how well Scottish Football is doing based on those stats. Sponsored by the SFA of course!

http://www.uefa.org/MultimediaFiles/Download/OfficialDocument/uefaorg/Finance/02/42/27/91/2422791_DOWNLOAD.pdf

I would love to see Sutton and Craigan's face just now. Any official comments coming from BT Sport since it was them that pretty much steamrollered this through?

http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=2566&newsCategoryID=1&newsID=16718

Case result for Kiernan not long in - not proven. Ridiculous that this was even raised.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-30830811 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/byres-road-diners-lucky-escape-7956627.amp https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/storm-desmond-street-glasgow-city-6958339.amp Bits falling off of roofs seem to normally make the news.

In all seriousness though is it even mentioned anywhere? A big piece of metal falling from a building onto a public area where it could have killed someone is a serious issue, whether that is Celtic Park, Ibrox, the Science Centre or the City Chambers.

So is the roof damage plastered over every red top today?

Ridiculous concept. There is no way this would have gone ahead.

I have to admit, in a sick way, I find their blogs entertaining. Especially JohnJames. He really is completely deluded. Surely there is no one out there that actually believes his ramblings of assassination attempts, living in exile and Masonic conspiriacies?

Out of interest has Griffiths ever been punished by the law for any of the things he's done (those mentioned in the article above aren't the only things he's been contacted by the "law" about)?

Out of interest, what isn't transparent that King could be more transparent about? Genuine question as I have absolutely zero business background.

Post #20 sums up exactly my response to this.

My original point is that others aren't criticised for not saying anything at all. Is King required to be firing out quotes left, right and centre just for the sake of it?

King is the "moneyman" for us. Desmond is for them. Why is he not criticised for his lack of communication?

Not that I'm defending King but how often do you hear from Dermott Desmond? How often do you hear from the main financiers of other clubs? Are they expected to be in the news making statements every couple of weeks?

Out of interest, are there any equivalent Rangers blogs that basically comments on their transfers, any financial rumours about them and basically spouts lies about them constantly? I struggle to think of one. And if so, why is it that they seem to be the only fans creepy enough to do this?