-
Posts
7,515 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Everything posted by JFK-1
-
Ridiculous and i'm not going to do what i'm 100% certain they or the hibz would do and claim it was theirs trying to get ours blamed.
-
Presumably to challenge for the league if possible but it might be the case that they have simply outspent us to the extent that's become harder than anticipated. When King took over he said the first target was to win the Championship which was accomplished then the next was to get back into Europe and he actually specified that initially that might have to be the Europa league. Today means little to that secondary objective. He did that in an effort to get back into it at 3-1 down and still 11 men on the park and I knew what he was doing as soon as he did it and was cool with that. May as well go for it and try to pull off a draw rather than defend a 3-1 defecit. What does that get us? We get zero points for 3-1 or 5-1. Senderos messed that up royally. I think that's like saying it's at the door of the manager that we don't have Sergio Ramos in the team. The manager would have him if he could but he wouldn't sign for us exactly like the list of centre backs we know he pursued wouldn't. Players declining to sign for us can't be laid at the managers door. As you say it would be irrational to suggest sacking the manager and that in fact could put us in a state of turmoil it could take us years to recover from. Everyone seems suddenly impressed by Rodgers when Warburton is every bit as good as he is. Do you think we would have seen that result today if they had swapped budgets? Rodgers has infinitely greater resources nothing else. I think what you might be seeing in terms of improvement or lack of it is that the opposition have improved from largely part timers to full timers of a better quality. I'm still more than confident that the manager is going to get this team playing and there will be little in that league but them who can match us.
-
A narrow defeat after 3 weeks of inactivity and playing a striker who had been out for months. I don't understand the relevance in going back to last season when we're talking about this seasons league. I can find even lower points if you want to do that.
-
It will get better and a lot better at that and we still haven't had a single chance of fielding a first choice starting 11 in any game. . It doesn't matter how the table looks at the end of today only at the end of the season and we wont play as badly as that again. This is the low point and I would rather have it now in the first handful of games.
-
Better than what? Better than being second in the league? If Aberdeen win today they too will be on 8 points from 5 games.
-
There can be no doubting they didn't turn up today but chances are it would have remained respectable and we might even have got back into it with another goal at 3-1 if Senderos hadn't walked. We could hardly expect anything else once both CB's were gone.
-
There is no way Warburton or the board will be giving any consideration to his position. He's the manager and will remain the manager till at least the end of his contract. He's as good as anything we could get and i'm happy with him.
-
I still think we can match anybody in the league but we need to get a settled starting 11 and get them gelling/playing. And maybe we need to try Crooks out at CB.
-
Haven't been in it but the Garner goal keeps us in the game. Something has to changes and I would prefer it if he makes halftime changes rather than the typical hour. Kranjcar is looking like a red card liability.
-
By all accounts he looked sharper at Linfield.
-
I wanted to see O'Halloran start but the manager knows best.
-
History can lead us to victory: Celtic v Rangers Match Preview
JFK-1 replied to 26th of foot's topic in Rangers Chat
Strong attacking options on the bench. -
Why not. That's what the Israelis did and played them off the park.
-
SUBS: Gilks, Halliday, Hill, Hodson, O’Halloran, Forrester, Waghorn
-
Do you have some sort of agenda to be in conflict with people? This isn't the type of forum for either that or the name calling you were just warned for.
-
I think perhaps that one in particular truly was so stupid he thinks UEFA really did say that because another of his kind said so and he didn't have the IQ to actually check the UEFA website before repeating it. That's what made it all the more comical when he told Adrian Durham that "you don't have the full facts"
-
Waghorn scored 3 in 24 appearances in his last season for Wigan. Is that impressive? As has been stated it only counts what they do for us.
-
Appears to be talking to himself.
-
You got further than me, I made it this far. What in the world is this guy talking about? Losing on their patch with a side that everyone agrees is not up to speed yet is more of a disaster for Warburton than Rodgers? I wonder if he actually reads this crap or it's just an unchecked flow of random words.
-
History can lead us to victory: Celtic v Rangers Match Preview
JFK-1 replied to 26th of foot's topic in Rangers Chat
Even better when the Welsh Forrest Gump that is Hartson is betting against you. There's a reason he is skint and his bookies are rich. -
They never consulted Paddy's blog though did they? Here it all is in a single article but again no consultation with Paddy's blog. http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/13215104.FIFA_step_into_new_row_over_Rangers__old_or_new_club__status/
-
He should have asked him for a link to this UEFA claim which would instantly have exposed him even further as a complete weirdo who has been getting his info from his mate Paddy's blog. It's actually totally hysterical. Adrian Durham isn't in posession of the "full facts" because he hasn't seen the blog of Timmy there's mate Paddy where real information is available. THIS is what UEFA have registered for Rangers. http://www.uefa.com/teamsandplayers/teams/club=50121/profile/ Timmy needs to find a better blog than Paddy's.
-
The logic escapes me if there is any. They decide they're a big enough brand all alone so effectively this match is just another match yet they boot the price up to 50 quid? Are they such a big brand all alone people will pay that 50 quid to see them play ANY other team in Scotland? How much will they charge when Kilmarnock are the visiting team in 2 weeks? Another 50 quid a head because they're such a big brand all alone? It's ludicrous and is probably just a silent nod to humour the obsessed grunts in their crowd without actually coming straight out and making a complete arse of themselves with these grunts.
-
History can lead us to victory: Celtic v Rangers Match Preview
JFK-1 replied to 26th of foot's topic in Rangers Chat
The manger said only Crooks and Dodoo are unavailable for Saturday but I don't see how Waghorn can be ready after having played nothing but some time in a testimonial in the past 5 weeks. -
Can YOU access the internet? You don't know there is a guy let's call him Timmy with a blog and he says it's a new club so Timmy and his blog obviously supercedes all your fancy footballing authorities?