-
Posts
55,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
246
Everything posted by ian1964
-
The Spring & Summer 2019 Transfer Rumours Thread
ian1964 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
-
- 2,040 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rfc youth
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
-
Think it's called panty wetters??
-
The Spring & Summer 2019 Transfer Rumours Thread
ian1964 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
Maybe he turned them down?. -
Ongoing issues with UEFA (two sanctions and counting)
ian1964 replied to Bill's topic in Rangers Chat
-
The Spring & Summer 2019 Transfer Rumours Thread
ian1964 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
-
The Spring & Summer 2019 Transfer Rumours Thread
ian1964 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
-
The Spring & Summer 2019 Transfer Rumours Thread
ian1964 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
-
Did Separate Entity FC not beat us at the knew camp last season after qualifying??, I can't remember!
-
Morelos, he came on and made an impact, the rest of the team well I just can't pick one as they were all poor.
-
Celtic Boys Club manager 'stuffed banknotes in boy's mouth'
ian1964 replied to ian1964's topic in General Football Chat
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...-scottish-football-sex-abuse-review-c28m3zzmwBig clubs and youth teams not separate, insists Scottish football sex abuse reviewMarc HorneSeptember 2 2019, 12:01am, The TimesCeltic FC was said to be inextricably linked to the Celtic Boys ClubCeltic FC was said to be inextricably linked to the Celtic Boys ClubALAMYShareSaveThe Independent Review of Sexual Abuse in Scottish Football has concluded that big clubs cannot distance themselves from abuse that took place within affiliated feeder clubs.Celtic Boys Club is not mentioned by name in the report, but its authors are satisfied that it was “inextricably” linked with Celtic FC when widespread sexual abuse, which has resulted in a series of recent convictions, took place.The Times understands that senior figures in the review team have made this clear, in explicit terms, to Celtic FC.The Parkhead club maintains that the boys’ club was a separate entity and, as such, it has no legal culpability. That stance is undermined in the interim report of the review commissioned by the Scottish FA.It states: “Historically in Scotland, in some areas, community-based youth football clubs have come into existence, developed and grown with an identity shared with the local senior professional club. In some cases, these are quite prominent. Essentially, they were ‘feeder’ clubs but with a relationship that went well beyond the throughput of young talent.”The review says that the ties between the senior club and youth teams were “clear and strong” and they were part of the same “family”. Officials of both clubs knew each other well and the senior club allowed the youth club to freely use its premises and facilities and the branding, colours and strips were almost if not identical, it adds.The review concludes that “if the relationship and history between the youth football club and the senior club was so shared, so close and so inextricable on positive achievements then when alleged sexual abuse of young players formed part of the history of one then it too formed part of the history of the other. A shared heritage is not confined to trophies, victories and celebration. It also extends to defeats, failures, and deficiencies. There are many downsides to this which sometimes overshadow the positives . . . At times the closeness of this relationship might, in the past, have manifested in a ‘closing of ranks’ if not a collusion. This is not surprising since any ‘reputational damage’ to one is therefore shared by the other.“Where the review has found that when allegations of sexual abuse have been made concerning the community-based youth football club our expectation would have been that the senior club (almost like a parent) would have taken steps to put this right permanently by doing the right thing. Unfortunately, we have seen some instances where this has not been the case and the senior club’s response has centred on protection of its reputation and standing rather than addressing the core problem with a view to achieving a permanent solution.” -
These type of knee jerk reactions are quite embarrassing tbh!. Some fans need to take a step back and think before posting!!
-
-
As I said earlier, the team selection/set up was a bit strange, however is that a reason why non of our players could pass a ball? the players let themselves down with poor individual performances. If that is Separate Entity out playing us then I'm looking forward to the next one!.
-
I don't! McGregor was dangerous, Jones was miss timed!. Jones was at the end of the match and was stupid, McGregor was allowed to influence the match result. I've yet to see the Morelos incident when he was on the ground after winning a free kick then the Separate Entity FC player slammed the ball into him when he was on the ground. Before all the '' ref was not to blame '' crew start I'm not saying that, but he did let them away with ,murder again!.
-
-
-
Lot of knee jerk reactions, typical after losing to them, we were poor in every area, team selection was dubious, however they were just as bad, we gifted them 2 goals and that's about it. First defeat of the season and all of a sudden we are a terrible team and the manager is shite, the players just never turned up. Long season to go so onwards and upwards after the break.
-
-
-
Neil Lennon makes Rangers fans claim as Celtic boss blasts Scottish football chiefs over sectarianism https://bit.ly/32j1DgG
-
Oh no! that's the match jinxed now!!!!!