ian1964

I noticed , just took me a bit of time finding it

The banner in the crowd just sets it off nicely :spl:

I must say I do prefer it when we win under a bit of ''contentious issues'' !!, must be the devil in me :devil:

No wonder some people get upset !!!,.....................eh Frankie??

Not complaining about it,just when everybody starts shouting their mouths off about '' it was never a penalty ''...................SHUT IT!!!!!

http://img200.imageshack.us/i/bannerchamps.jpg/ :spl:

We all knew what he was like !!!

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ir8bog&s=3 http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=vr3280&s=3

Agreed,Weir for me :spl:

I wasn't disagreeing with you,actually I was agreeing,just being sarcastic regarding EPL players and their worth

Agreed,I don't think he is better than Bougherra

The very fact that Lescott is an EPL player increases his value over Bougherra

Is it ?,thought it was more than that Craig

True...........you're biased

I'm certain it's an automatic ban,not sure if it carries a 2-3 match ban though,you're right we will find out soon enough

Yip,straight red = 3 game ban..........I think it's 3 games???

If anybody was watching Bougherra today..............I think we can rest easy that he will be staying with us

Manchester City and Everton have confirmed that an agreement has finally been reached over the transfer of defender Joleon Lescott. The fee has not been revealed but is thought to be about �£24m for Lescott, 26, and looks set to bring an end to bitter negotiations between the clubs. A statement on the Toffees website said: "After the earlier bid, there was a change in the player's attitude. "It was in the best interests of Everton if they allowed him to leave." The move is subject to a medical and Lescott agreeing personal terms with City. The Eastlands club offered �£15m for Lescott after John Terry decided to stay at Chelsea last month. This was increased to �£18m but rejected out of hand by Everton boss David Moyes, who insisted that Lescott was not going to leave. 606: DEBATE Will there be even more signings? mrfootballfanno1 Two weeks ago, Lescott made a transfer request but that was turned down by Moyes, who criticised City for the way their offers had been made in public, and for saying they would go over the Everton boss's head to secure the deal. Lescott was dropped for a poor attitude after Everton's 6-1 home defeat by Arsenal on the first day of the Premier League season, and the clubs revealed they had finally started negotiating on Saturday. The Everton statement added: "Chairman Bill Kenwright has worked tirelessly to get the best deal for Everton, achieving a substantial increase on Manchester City's original offer." It leaves Moyes with Joseph Yobo as his only fit recognised centre-back as Phil Jagielka remains a long-term absentee with a knee injury and just a week to find a replacement before the end of the transfer window. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/8216645.stm

I wish something would happen,either Murray gets his finger out take more interest and try to get the club out of the shit that he has put us in,or GTF and let someone else revive us..................I know it's all been said before but it is feckin depressing as I say,better the devil you know or risk new ownership ???.

Where/when is this all going to go away????,things are just getting worse,depressing !!!

Ã?£7m Aiden? You’ve got to be joking TONY MOWBRAY has warned Spurs they will be laughed out of Celtic Park if they try to nick Aiden McGeady on the cheap. The Hoops boss insists he has no plans to flog star man McGeady after SunSport revealed White Hart Lane chief Harry Redknapp is eyeing a bid. NO SALE ... boss Mowbray NO SALE ... boss Mowbray Asked about a potential Ã?£7million deal for the 22-year-old, Mogga scoffed: "No, I don't think so. "Nobody has told me we have to do this or that, so you would hope we wouldn't be selling. "If somebody came in and bid Ã?£80m, then who knows? Cristiano Ronaldo wasn't for sale then all of a sudden he was gone. "But I'm not sitting here having been told I need to bring in Ã?£20m or Ã?£10m or Ã?£5m or Ã?£1m. We're just going along. "I don't want to create any speculation. You could change Aiden's name for Scott Brown, Shaun Maloney or others." Redknapp was at Celtic Park to watch long-term target Brown in Champions League action against Arsenal last Tuesday. But it was McGeady who caught his eye and he could yet come in with a big offer for the winger. http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/2601453/Spurs-are-warned-they-wont-sign-Aiden-McGeady-on-the-cheap.html

Baffles me as well, I had hoped to see him get fit and pushing for the first team as I do rate him

SOME look at it as the beginning of the end. They see it as a terrible state of affairs. It's viewed as a sorry situation which will spell disaster for Rangers in the months ahead. They've let a whole team of players go in the last year and not brought in one single signing. It's an amazing stat if looked at in isolation. It's also something Ibrox fans may feel will only have a detrimental impact to their hopes of making inroads at home and abroad. My inclination is to think the total opposite. For me, it's just what Rangers need - right across the board. Losing players hasn't weakened Rangers. On the contrary, it's strengthened them. First things first, Walter Smith's squad was too big. He had far too many players with the task of keeping them all happy a virtually impossible one. If anyone could do it, it was Walter. His man-management style is legendary having been there and done it with top class players for the majority of his career. He'll know better than anyone how to say all the right things to players on the fringes but it's not easy. Players look into every little detail when teams are picked and bibs are handed out during training sessions and practice games. Even the slightest hint they're not in the first 11 and they can be unsettled. All of a sudden the manager has a headache he doesn't need. That's a risk a club runs when they have a squad which is much bigger than it needs to be. Advertisement Simply because everyone can't play at the one time. I'm not just talking about the Saturday games when the squad list goes up on the board. It's day to day when training sessions can become a waste of time as there are too many bodies. The ideal number from a coaching point of view is 20 first-team outfielders and Rangers seem to be there. For me they're maybe just one player short of an ideal situation and that's because of circumstance. Kirk Broadfoot's injury has robbed them of cover needed in defence. It would amaze me if Walter didn't bring in another central defender before this transfer window closes. He'll also be keen to ensure he doesn't lose any of his key men. But if things stay as they Rangers are not in such a bad state. The current situation also does something for the club which can only help them in the long-term. It sends out a message to every youngster there which says: Now is your chance. Murray Park was built for the progression of youth and it's not done too badly in the last few years. Alan Hutton's �£9million move to Spurs virtually justified the place in one deal. Other lesser moves like Charlie Adam to Blackpool for �£500,000 and Ross McCormack to Doncaster for �£100,000 have helped. Now the boys in there have been given an incentive like never before. They don't need to bang on the manager's door to ask if they're going to get an opportunity. It's there in front of them. They need to grasp it and make sure it doesn't pass them by. In the past the accusation has been that Rangers have signed players instead of rearing their own. Those days are gone. http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/2599339/Walts-playing-numbers-game-to-perfection.html

Correct,however it's the Scottish mhedia we're on on about

Hard to judge them on that performance, Hearts were pish !!