-
Posts
4,607 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Everything posted by cooponthewing
-
match thread (image) [FT] Braga 0 - 1 Rangers (Kent 61)
cooponthewing replied to DMAA's topic in Rangers Chat
Away fans will be banned "IF" we get through. Guaranteed? -
I simply don't believe our refs are incompetent, I believe they are corrupt. That's just my view but I would like to highlight one important thing. If there is decades of cover up within a footballing institution, that's now allegedly being ignored and swept away by those in political power, why would anyone think that our referees would not be as corrupt as the rest? The stench of this is everywhere. I don't know if we will ever get to the bottom of it?
-
Have to say I agree with you on this Bill. Something isn't right behind the scenes and they don't appear to be playing for the manager. Maybe they got pissed off with SG slating them in public (can't imagine shagger and Davis being happy with that?) or maybe all the off field and refereeing stuff has got to them? Maybe some players have personal problems? I could be wrong and it's none of them but something is definitely wrong in the dressing room imo. Some will say but what about Thursday night? They were all in the shop window in the Europa league, turning it on then (Or at least shaking a leg) suits them personally.
-
gpl predictions (image) Bluebear54's GPL 2019/20: St Johnstone v Rangers
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
3-1 Bears fgs Morelos -
match thread (image) [FT] Rangers 3 - 2 Braga (Hagi 67, 82; Aribo 75)
cooponthewing replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
What a nightmare! Voice has gone-totally fuc**d...??⚪️? Incredible European Nights under the Lights?? Wow! -
I have to say I am all for it. It's long overdue and a loyalty scheme is the best way to go.
-
gpl predictions (image) Bluebear54's GPL 2019/20: Rangers vs Braga
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
3-1Bears fgs Morelos -
Who has it been sold to BD?
-
Me neither John, I won't be taking the bait.
-
Not for much longer.
-
match thread (image) [FT] Rangers 1 - 0 Livingston (Arfield 59)
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Totally agree MacK. Halliday was excellent today and Arfield again one of the few playing well. -
match thread (image) [FT] Rangers 1 - 0 Livingston (Arfield 59)
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Was just going to ask that Rab. I'm up the other end, hearing the pen was a definite pen too? -
match thread (image) [FT] Rangers 1 - 0 Livingston (Arfield 59)
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Funnily enough I walked my niece home today after lunch. Walked past the Louden and I had noticed all the supporters busses. I am presuming that they will not be back down or up tomorrow? Folk from NI will go back tomorrow too I suspect. I am not expecting a bumper crowd? -
match thread (image) [FT] Rangers 1 - 0 Livingston (Arfield 59)
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Unreal? Wow! How they going to have it ready? -
match thread (image) [FT] Rangers 1 - 0 Livingston (Arfield 59)
cooponthewing replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Ended up sitting in the subway food place on the PR. Tbh the end of the pitch up at the Broamie has been a shambles for ages. -
Man City Banned from Champions League
cooponthewing replied to cooponthewing's topic in General Football Chat
Sheffield Utd chairmen will be having an enjoyable evening. -
I see you have corrected that for for me Frankie. In my defence I was having a piss while posting and was a bit hasty, apologies?
-
I am seeing this on Twitter. An alleged sectarian attack earlier this week fuelled by the online and MSM hate.
-
Manchester City have been banned from European club competition for the next two seasons after being found to have committed "serious breaches" of Uefa's club licensing and financial fair play regulations. The reigning Premier League champions have also been fined 30m euros (£25m). The decision is subject to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Manchester City say they are "disappointed but not surprised" by the "prejudicial" decision and will appeal. The independent Adjudicatory Chamber of the Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) said City had broken the rules by "overstating its sponsorship revenue in its accounts and in the break-even information submitted to Uefa between 2012 and 2016", adding that the club "failed to cooperate in the investigation". It has been reported that City could also face a Premier League points deduction because the league's FFP rules are similar - although not exactly the same - as Uefa's. Manchester City said in a statement: "The club has always anticipated the ultimate need to seek out an independent body and process to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence in support of its position. "In December 2018, the Uefa chief investigator publicly previewed the outcome and sanction he intended to be delivered to Manchester City, before any investigation had even begun. "The subsequent flawed and consistently leaked Uefa process he oversaw has meant that there was little doubt in the result that he would deliver. The club has formally complained to the Uefa disciplinary body, a complaint which was validated by a CAS ruling. "Simply put, this is a case initiated by Uefa, prosecuted by Uefa and judged by Uefa. With this prejudicial process now over, the club will pursue an impartial judgment as quickly as possible and will therefore, in the first instance, commence proceedings with the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the earliest opportunity." City have been drawn to face Real Madrid in the last 16 of this season's Champions League, with the first leg to be played on 26 February at the Bernabeu. La Liga President Javier Tebas praised Uefa for "finally taking decisive action". "Enforcing the rules of financial fair play and punishing financial doping is essential for the future of football," he said. "For years we have been calling for severe action against Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain, we finally have a good example of action and hope to see more. Better late than never." This is massive news. Given the speed of their statement in response, it is fair to assume Manchester City were braced for this decision, but maybe not the severity of it. City have said publicly and privately they intend to fight the decision. They are adamant an independent judiciary - they do not think this was - will clear them. However, as it stands, the club are out of the Champions League for two seasons, which raises massive immediate questions. Pep Guardiola has always maintained he would remain at City at least until his contract expires in 2021 but has also said he trusts the club's hierarchy when they tell him they have done nothing wrong. Whether they win the Champions League this season or not, will Guardiola decide to move on? And if he does, what about the future of the club's star players, many of whom joined because he was the manager. And does this mean an extra place in the Champions League will be available should the Blues miss out? It is an absolutely fascinating situation and, clearly, we are far from a definitive final outcome. What are City alleged to have done? Uefa launched an investigation after German newspaper Der Spiegel published leaked documents in November 2018 alleging City had inflated the value of a sponsorship deal, misleading European football's governing body. Reports alleged City - who have always denied wrongdoing - deliberately misled Uefa so they could meet FFP rules requiring clubs to break even. City were fined £49m in 2014 for a previous breach of regulations. What are the FFP rules? Financial Fair Play was introduced by Uefa to prevent clubs in its competitions from spending beyond their means and stamp out what its then president Michel Platini called "financial doping" within football. Under the rules, financial losses are limited and clubs are also obliged to meet all their transfer and employee payment commitments at all times. Clubs need to balance football-related expenditure - transfers and wages - with television and ticket income, plus revenues raised by their commercial departments. Money spent on stadiums, training facilities, youth development or community projects is exempt. The CFCB, set up by Uefa, has the ultimate sanction of banning clubs from Uefa competitions, with other potential punishments including warnings, fines, withholding prize money, transfer bans, points deductions, a ban on registration of new players and a restriction on the number of players who can be registered for Uefa competitions. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51510284
-
Ongoing retail issues: RFC to sue Elite (Updated 14/02/20)
cooponthewing replied to stewarty's topic in Rangers Chat
So I'm presuming that's another merchandise boycott until this is cleared up. The feeling being it appears that fat Mike has his grubby hands up elites ass? So, what's happened here? We have signed a deal with elite, they sponsored auchenowie and subsequently there is suggestions that someone is interfering in our relationship with Elite? So much so that we are now entering litigation with them for monies owed. Total mess. -
Aha! Ah well, just to reinforce the point ?
-
Interesting tweet I just found?