Danny

You're right. You didn't type the words 'I hate him' but your post implied it by slating everything about him.

Money is the only reason to sell. I can accept that reason. But all the insults being flung at him suddenly because he's being rumoured to depart? Quite shite imo.

I suspect you are another I am never going to agree with.

Ah, our loyalty when a story about a rumoured departure kicks in is truly heartening. People like you forget that we cannot afford to lose a single player, ability irrelevant, and just decide they hate the player in question so screw Rangers.

So, you have decided this story is true because...you don't like him.

4% of their entire season gate return. http://www.donssupporterstogether.com/dst-on-rangers-newco-sporting-integrity-and-the-financial-reality/ 15,468 for the Aberdeen 1 - 2 Rangers game that Naisy got injured in. 8,779 for the following match at home against Motherwell. 9,500 against St Mirren. 7000 against Hibs. Where do they get this 4% from I wonder. Take away the 2 home Rangers games and that's a massive dent in their pockets. What a sodding bunch of liars.

Astonishingly awful rendition. My God.

Fourth Official said it's total nonsense. But then I pointed out he was one to talk given all the rumours he's got wildly wrong in the past. He replied 'ok mate' and someone else said he's the best transfer source on Twitter. Apparently there's no good transfer source on Twitter then! But, on this one, I hope his crystal ball is correct. As for the odd claims about Naismith's fitness, I find it bizarre folk are quite happy to sell him given how sensational he was prior to injury. Both were pure bad luck, and he recovered clean from them both. It's madness to sell him for football reasons - utterly fickle opinion. If it's financial, I accept that - we're in the mire and we need money. But anyone saying it's ok because he's injury prone, imo, is off base. I think some are looking at him and trying to justify the fact we need the money, to themselves, by saying he's an injury doubt. He's also the best player in Scotland by a country mile. Money is the only reason to sell.

ESPN and SFA are part of this boycott Zaps.

The anthem. I'll save that for a laugh in HD too then as well.

We agree on nothing, but this! I'm saving it for HD tonight.

Hopefully complete crap but sadly not implausible; Naismith will apparently be joining Everton on a 4 year deal, to be announced next week.

It's on again this evening on ESPN at half 6. I will record it for posterity. Screw the result, the chance to watch King Carlos deck Brown in HD is too much to pass up.

Also interesting. It's good to see our guys would not cooperate with Daly at all, why should they? Something Daly took as incrimination of their 'guilt'. But they are happy to separately publicly justify and defend their payment and the EBTs. It's a bit of a finger up to the BBC really.

Haha, let me get this straight. To preserve TV rights and sponsorship, a newco Rangers would be allowed back in the SPL. But every other sanction SFA and SPL could carry out on us is being carried out? 'We'll rescind all your titles, but keep you in the SPL because it would kill the league and us if you left'. The weasel nature of Scottish football authorities is despicable.

Very interesting. First time a 'beneficiary' has spoken out. Wouldn't cooperate with Daly, but defends himself and the club against his accusations.

Misread the broadcast time, sorry anyone who missed the match due to my error. Kinda glad i didn't see the game now.

So you're not really interested in the SFA boycott concept thingy?

If you weren't, would you?

ESPN have it live at 1pm I think it is. With our feelings on the SFA, but the fact at least 3 of our players will be playing for both sides, will you watch tomorrow? McGregor has not boycotted the national side, and tbh it doesn't look like any of our other players have. And of course Edu and Boca will turn out for USA. So, who's watching?

What I am saying is they showed certain documents and evidence to prove certain claims, but stopped short of showing us the documents proving the dual contract EBT claim. Why?

How do they look passable when it's all utterly conjecture and, up to this point, completely unproven?

Well at least none of them contributed to the Daly documentary trying to incriminate us. That's something at least.

I am! I always do

I really don't. Oh, I would never deny your right to free speech. Hence the beauty of democracy. Don't recall asking for you to be moderated or banned. Maybe you can quote where I did. And there was me thinking the banners themselves filled you with joy.