Danny

Exactly what is King's business here anyway? He claims to be a creditor for the oldco, which makes him part of the problem. Just what exactly is he playing at now?

Who the fucking hell does Dave King think he is? He should piss right off and stop interfering. He's a blowhard and I don't want him anywhere near Ibrox.

We'd end up that way if we ended up back in their league with 5m sanctions up our arse anyway.

Division one means those clubs who vote 'no' survive with the same money from Sky. I don't really want to do those fuckers any favours.

What the fuck? Jean Alain Boumsong wants to return?! Has his career gone so badly down the spout he wants to come back to us? Is this April 1st?

A journo who can't type properly? What kind of journo can't type?! Like a navigation officer who can't tell left from right!

To be exact it would be Craig Whyte's fault.

Just common sense Pete. In the way without gravity we'd float, without money companies die. SPL clubs rely crucially on the Sky money for their very survival - and as you correct Gaz above, OF clause is part of the deal. So activate that clause, Sky walks away, or renegotiate, money goes massively down or disappears entirely. Just seems an inevitable outcome. You're right, nothing is certain and you can't predict the future, but the evidence here is pretty compelling.

Not true. As Pete says. A stipulation is the OF deal. It's in the contract.

tbh you're wrong. As has been stated by a few, SPL clubs are already living beyond their means. Take that money away and how exactly are they going to survive? Gate receipts alone? The only option is if another broadcaster buys the rights, and no one apart from ESPN has Sky's money levels, and it's unclear as to whether or not ESPN would be legally able to take exclusive control of the SPL rights.

I remember that Pernis interview. It was absolutely fucking awful. Truly embarrassing.

A renegotiation which would see the 110M the deal is currently worth probably halved. Which would still kill the SPL.

I apologise for my part in this but it's not easy to ignore accusations as serious as CG's. And I will defend myself when someone makes as big a deal of something as he has.

That is your standard insult to those you disagree with it seems. Pathetic behaviour, stooping as low as labelling me as timlike. Do you actually think I read your posts with more attention than anyone else's? Like I'd remember your opinion on things. Is your opinion really that important that others should remember it? 'time and time again'. I said once that I accused you of having personal dislike for McCulloch - in one post. Where the fuck is the lie, let alone the 'repeated' lie. If you could possibly provide evidence of me lying, maybe I'd understand why you repeatedly call me a liar. Oh, pity, I'll never get to hear a response to the above. Ah well.

Then he is a raging hypcrite. But still not a relevant one, despite some airtime. Just because you work for the BBC and possess an opinion, it doesn't mean people take it seriously. Look at Chick ffs! He's the most lampooned guy around and he is in as big a position as Spence, if not bigger.

Haha, ok, I stand corrected Steel. Maybe the guy has more influence than I originally suspected, but I really didn't like the tone I was being addressed in with regards this. Not by you.

Like I say, I have seen nothing from him in the past year. And I suspect no one would be whining about him now if one person had not seen his hypocritical Dundee blog and raised attention to it.

Prime BBC football pundit? I guess a lot has changed since I last heard from him - he was an irrelevant wee nyat before. And I'm not entirely convinced he's anything other than that despite getting a bit of airtime. Btw, please don't accuse me of 'ignoring clear examples of bias' when you know fine well I've been vocal in objection to the BBC. You saying that to me is not dissimilar to your own objection when this site was compared to the BBC recently. Unfair and unwarranted. Anyway, let us move on.

I...detect slight hostility. Maybe my post was being too deadpan - I am pointing out Jim Spence is a complete irrelevance and his opinions on things are not worthy of getting worked up about. He has no influence, doesn't get the chance to make TV programs which get aired to millions, and isn't even as useful as a pundit. It's not like I haven't attacked the BBC before, you know I have. Not sure why you reacted in this manner to my post.

I haven't listened to Radio Scotland for a very, very long time. I literally haven't heard the man's voice for maybe a year if not more.

Having seen none of this I can only take your word for it. He really does strike me as a total irrelevance - I'm not sure when he gained so much credibility that our fans react furiously to his hypocrisy.

He's only a hypocrite if he's been condemning Rangers and I must say I pay little attention to him so can someone enlighten me?

Water off a duck's back to him, as it is to me on mine too. Sad thing is all the Rangers bloggers are targets for tims - hence why I for one killed comments on mine.

CG has edited his post to suggest my 'behaviour' is that of a tim. He is the one adding more fuel to any fire, and his recent posts are extremely disappointing and incendiary. No pun intended.

You just call people liars left right and centre. I stuck up for you when you were called one yourself - but now here you are calling me one. I at no point lied to you - you could say, in your opinion, that I accused you falsely of something (of personally disliking McCulloch). But I did not lie. I did not say something I know to be untrue. But here you are flinging the term liar left right and centre and it's frankly appalling. Ah brother, I just bit.