Sorry I find that the correct decision. Morelos was a wrong decision but this was correct. McGregor knew what he was doing. I don't like that we will be missing McGregor for 2 games but keepers can't be free to make tackles like that.
What I do find a talking point is why did Morelos get an extra game for appealing and McGregor doesn't.
I think the Brown incident was looked at by the CO but was given not proven it was intentional which I must say I don't think it is 100% certain. I agree Morelos should also be not proven but as I say that is a different argument.
So we can rule out all overhead kicks from the game then. The guy was following the ball and tried to bring it down out the air. I don't believe he even knew Jack was there. Funny how people think it is okay for McGregor to come in with a straight leg and studs showing under the name of protecting himself.
Sorry to upset the apple cart but I think the referee and SFA have got this spot on.
The problem was he was left with too many players of championship class and I think he and King did not see eye to eye and so he got little budget to improve.
When working properly then it should really do away with the need for a compliance officer. Every situation has then been looked at by at least 3 referee's
An honest system would be that referee's watch the game back the following morning and decide if mistakes have been made. Now it seems to be the gutter press making decisions what and whom they promote.
Unfortunately we know it will not be rescinded. The Candeias joke was proof that it is not what the incident throws up but what the best way to save face is, That is mostly putting the blame on Rangers.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.