pete

After a poor start he got us playing some good football and got us winning and a draw with Celtic at Parkhead. Pedro's record is give everyone else a record win.

Again a bad decision by Pedro. We would have been better off with one of those good looking female physio's. Male Physio's are so out of date!

I tried to do a match thread yesterday evening but kept falling asleep so I gave up and had no time today. I am afraid I like the players need a summer break for new energy.

I guess when King says all the ST money will go to improving the team, Investors will need to put in money to cover the running costs. I don't think you should put all in the past but what is in the future.

Just a little anecdote on that. I was at a pub Quiz when I was in Glasgow last week and one of the Questions was: "Who wrote the Hunger Games" One guy shouted out Bobby Sands which had the whole pub in stitches.

Murty did it against Celtic at Parkhead and also dominated Hearts and Aberdeen at Ibrox. He had the same journeymen.

I agree with you on this one but the Newcastle loans were a stitch- up and I still say Vuckic was good for us as was Hyndman initially. I think it was unfair to think Hyndman a 20 year old could carry us through a half season. Roberts of them proves that it can be positive. Every player you sign whether fast or loan holds a risk.

Yes you may put it that way but did the manager not say himself the important thing for Rangers is winning. It does not matter how we play as long as we win. That really sends out a clear message.

Ouch!!!!!!!

He has added to his CV the biggest defeat we have had at Ibrox against Celtic and the first defeat against Aberdeen at Ibrox in 26 years. Yes he is doing great.

Yes you see it perfectly. Fine to know. Pour yourself a feel good. expensive whisky. look in the mirror while lighting your Cuban cigar and compliment yourself for being an uber-supporter while straightening your cravat. The manager has done a great job? Nah look in the mirror and ask yourself how you come to that conclusion? Was it you who said you would not go back if we sign Naismith?

I was also singing follow follow and wasn't bothered with the quality. It was a GIRUY to the Aberdeen fans.

90% of the time a new manager will improve a team even if only for a short while. Even with a new manager you should be able to see the shape of the way he wants to play. In the 2 games I saw live(which does let you see far more than the telly) I never saw any structure whatsoever. I also never got from the telly how lazy Toral is. Thankfully he will be leaving back for Arsenal where he will disappear into the realms of the lower leagues or the Spanish 2nd division.

Link doesn't work for me. Am I alone in this?

Brahim you were complaining to me about people keeping dragging up your past. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Why did you resign then D'Art? That is the bit I don't get. And if nothing was resolved in why you and the ladies resigned, Why did they want back on board?

PC has yet to show he has a scooby about how to manage a football team or get them playing to a standard befitting of them and to be honest I wouldn't mind if his name is at the top of the list of people to leave the club. He has clearly bitten off more than he can chew.

Rangers 2-1 Miller.

Like many the historic thing means nothing to me but I don't believe in turning the clock back as it rarely works out successful. I think Naismith would be this season's Joey Barton in that we would expect a lot and get much less than is on the package.

FS thanks for arranging my tickets. There can't be much better seats than the ones you supplied me with and also a drink in club 72. Right at the front of the Sandy Jardine Rear and almost on the centre-line there can't be many better views than that. I would imagine the chance of getting a season ticket there now would be very slim to non-existent though.

I do find it a bit strange that they are returning when the conflict of interest has not been resolved and that is why they resigned. Also unfortunate timing to announce it at the same time as the CH resignation. All looks a bit awkward.

Never change a winning team.

I disagree as this is not an election. You are just being asked whether they should be allowed to take up their old position. It is yes or no and not pick and choose.

Does Craig resigning have a say on this decision? I will say, if it is then it is poor show they didn't make that clear that it was Craig they had the problem with.

3-0 Rangers Toral