pete

Remember how Brown and co were blowing out their rectums when we put them out of the cup,

We won 54 league titles, or at least most of them, without it so I have no idea why it is now so important. Also it is something that everyone can interpret differently. Look at the difference in fitness to the tims when Rogers took over from Delilah. i take it Delilah also had sport science.

Jock Wallace got them fitter than all other teams. Our fitness has been questionable since that sport science crap begun. It should not be that they are told to rest, they should be so knackered they only want to rest.

I wish we would get Sport Science to %%%% and get a manager\coach in that gets the players as fit as possible in the old way.

Merry Christmas I hope Santa has filled your stockings.

One thing is certain is that if Rangers had won 3-0 and had been winning of late this discussion would not even be on the table

Yes it would seem on and off the field we can't hit our goals.

You have thrown up an interesting discussion in that: Is the half-time break an official training session or is it just a kick-around for the subs to waste the 15 minutes until the end of the break. If it is just a kick-around to waste time then I don't see what is wrong with having a tongue wag, but if they are supposed to be warming up then you are right they should have been trying harder. Personally I think it is just a casual kick-about to stretch their legs although I am not sure the clubs view on it.

I would imagine many of the penny shares may cash in but supporters or people who paid 70 pence are unlikely to sell for 20 pence.

Unfortunately buying a player at the price we pay there are never guarantee's he is better than a cheaper option. It is the same as buying a car between 10 year old and 20 year old. there are right bangers at 10 year old but you are buying a car from 2007 and pay a 2007 price. There are some cracking cars without rust at 20 year and in far better condition than the 2007 banger but it is a £500 car.

Murtry said the last time he had no interest but this time he threw his hat in the ring early and said from the beginning he wanted the job permanently.

I think you are wrong and they will then have to sack him. He is not Interim anymore he has stated he has a fixed time. Has Murty not signed a contract and have a say on players coming in and out in January? surely they wouldn't give him that as interim.

We can keep naming names but we have a new manager until the end of the season.

The thing I have got with that is that with Kilmarnock we had a good chance of getting the points. Against Celtic we probably won't win with or without Alves.

Yes he could be key.

Welcome mate I hope you enjoy the discussions on here. Have a merry Xmas!

He should have played the diamond with Pena in the point, McCrorie at the back and Holt and Barjonas in the middle. He could even have played Herrera up front and put Morelos in the point. Windass or Kranjcar in the point was another option as was 3 at the back. There were plenty of options he just picked the wrong one.

This was purely a managerial fault. 4 men in the midfield. 2 men out wide McCrorie in front of the defence and Holt with about an acre of the midfield to cover alone.

Yes but not by us unfortunately. Hodson should never be near a Rangers shirt.

That counts that one out as he was a favourite with some supporters.

This guy is on a total crash course with GVB and there is obviously a breakdown of discipline with him now. He was once a good striker. Tall and Lanky and good in the air. Worth a punt on loan if we could get him and make him feel wanted which he does not have at Feynoord.

This guy is on a total crash course with GVB and there is obviously a breakdown of discipline with him now. He was once a good striker. Tall and Lanky and good in the air. Worth a punt on loan if we could get him and make him feel wanted which he does not have at Feynoord.

I really can't understand why if 3 people buy shares they can be counted as a block for King. i will admit to not having studied the situation much.

I am not so sure it is good business I find 3.5 years far too long for a player who still has to prove himself. I think a 2 year contract was better.