

MacK1950
-
Posts
7,524 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Everything posted by MacK1950
-
Hibernian 1 - 2 Rangers: Player Ratings and MotM Poll
MacK1950 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
My marks for game. Foderingham-8 also my man of match Tavernier- 6 Alves-5 Wilson-7 John-6 Barjonas-5 Holt-7 McCrorie-7 Windass-7 Miller-3 Morelos-7 Subs. Candeias-6 Bates-6 Herrera-4 -
[FT] Hibernian 1 - 2 Rangers (Windass 42; Morelos 45)
MacK1950 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
A good ground out result,two cracking goals,a sloppy one given away by Alves,Foddy continuing our good goalkeeping tradition,three youngsters on field at end so much to enjoy. Oh can't forget Murty seems to have plans A-B-C regards tactics,impressive. -
The January Transfer Window Rumours and Deals Thread
MacK1950 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
Wouldn't like Cumming to be coming. -
Thanks for that,I have not just followed results over period you stated,but been there watching,many highs and lows,as there has been since I started following in early sixties. Through it all I have always been a "glass half full"type and will continue to be so. Following Rangers has cost me a lot in all these years and the good times WILL:cheers: be back
-
Jeze so depressing we didn't get McInness and now awaiting failure in next game pessimists galore.
-
Incompetent as it has been all the way:ost:
-
Aberdeen Statement - McInnes to stay at Aberdeen
MacK1950 replied to chilledbear's topic in Rangers Chat
#56 what offer? we haven't spoken to him/them. -
How would he know that if he didn't speak with us????
-
That I don't know Craig but if true I am sorry for my post.
-
What I have not read in all the comments is that the "family" situation might have been a deciding factor in his decision. If they are happy staying where they are why push them into the goldfish bowl that is the West of Scotland?. It is a missed opportunity for him ,so let's move on but to whom I don't have a clue.
-
Aberdeen Statement - McInnes to stay at Aberdeen
MacK1950 replied to chilledbear's topic in Rangers Chat
Is Traynor the leak at the club(unofficially of course). -
The last two"fishy" First Ministers seem to have a tunnel vision and are intent on brainwashing the electorate.
-
If it is DM he must come in and adhere to the set-up as it seems to be working. Imagine going into a new job environment and insisting that everything be scrapped,it is not feasible IMO. As far as we are concerned we have "fixed" the old system and it does not need another fix,only a safe pair of hands to better it.
-
The only people who these songs have meaning for are the fans,I doubt that many of the first team squad will have knowledge of them. Many of the songs are tuneful and if they did not have the add-ons of things like FTP,God save the Queen etc.they could be more enjoyable. It is brilliant when you hear the likes of Penny Arcade,Simply the best,Blue Blue Grass etc.,without the references to UDA and the like.
-
I supported Pedro at first but as time went on it became clear he was not up to job.The new manager will receive the same support and hopefully will not fail so spectacularly:rfc:.
-
Does it make sense to bring Docherty.Working as a team so long stagnates ideas and negates change. As I and others on here think he should be united with a fresh assistant and things might happen.
-
Regards money can Sky not be asked to verify such a cut as the blazer heads won't.
-
Aberdeen 1 - 2 Rangers: Player Ratings and MotM Poll
MacK1950 replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
My MoM Jack despite sending off. Ratings:- Foderingham 7 Tavernier 8 Bates 8 Wilson 7 John 6 Holt 8 Jack 8 Pena 7 McCrorie 8 Miller 7 Windass 7 Subs Candeias 7 Cardoso 7 Herrera 1 -
[FT] Aberdeen 1 - 2 Rangers (Wilson 14; Windass 63)
MacK1950 replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
Have to totally disagree with Gaffer,a deliberate follow through is when the opponents foot/leg is already there,which is not the case here as May came in late from the side,sliding under Jack's boot. The two other tackles by Aberdeen which have been highlighted are more warranting of punishment as bot these are late and also behind and cowardly,but such is the standard of refereeing by our so called "top officials"that we will be going on and on with this in future games. -
[FT] Aberdeen 1 - 2 Rangers (Wilson 14; Windass 63)
MacK1950 replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
Same as penalty takers are not supposed to curtail their run-up,this happens too often and is let go. -
If Murty gets three in a row no brainer!!!. Seriously though we need stability and if Murty continues to supply this in terms of results and performances it is hard to see by him. I know that someone on this thread has advocated McInnes/Murty as the answer and it meets with my agreement as I mooted this a long while ago. Why we have to bring a "team" as new manager I don't know as we are looking for a new beginning,and who the hell are McInnes's team??????
-
Not able to play against ten men he should fit in it has been a long Rangers problem:devil::devil::laugh:
-
That's the problem when going for Managers currently in employment you have to take their "luggage"too.
-
[FT] Aberdeen 1 - 2 Rangers (Wilson 14; Windass 63)
MacK1950 replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
Okay you don't want to sit like little boys but don't stand on areas you are not supposed to!!!!!!!! -
[FT] Aberdeen 1 - 2 Rangers (Wilson 14; Windass 63)
MacK1950 replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
Good photo, shows why plod really look at us,probably Union Bears, remember( I used word "probably"),but no matter what an embarrassment to the club.