boabie

I agree with you mate. Lionbrand is I believe being ran by a well meaning bear on a part time basis. He is doing the best he can with the spare time he has to work with but as you say, there is a vast market out there. One problem though - are there enough shares available to buy if 50,000 folk buy the alternative ?

Mr Dornan, you're fooling nobody.

Alternative unofficial tops are already available mate - red and black stripes. I agree though that players, etc should be doing more to help.

If it does indeed go to SD or RR we should give the shirt sponsorship over to someone for free. Maybe a child abuse charity ?

An excellent article where the main points won't see the light of day in the mainstream media and probably won't rate a mention from the grumpy arses among our support who never ever seem to see anything good in what's going on at Ibrox. Sometimes I wonder if many of them really are Rangers supporters or just like doing the mank thing and spend their time discussing all things Rangers.

BJ , maybe I caught a different interview from yourself but my understanding of what was being said by DW was, we got the main targets he was after but 'may' make further signings.

Paul Murray though was not willing to accept any liability for any monies due if we lost the EBT case. He wanted responsibility to stay with DM's companies. That didn't suit DM or LBG so they looked around for a useful idiot who would. The curtain opened and billionaire Whyte appeared.

Waghorn continues to get lazier and lazier.

Unlucky again O'Halloran. He's working well here.

O'Halloran worked well there. Only great defending stopped us scoring.

Waggy with snow on the roof.

And even in a friendly the Germans just can't resist diving around and cheating. It's a trait they have I've always detested.

To be fair Pete, the opposition are pressing hard any time we are on the ball. We've played better. But I'm happy so far as it's a friendly.

I can understand what they're saying mate. That makes a change from the babbling garbage spoken by Mutton and the rest.

Wilson would have cleared that had he not been so stiff.

I'm watching via ---- http://www.servustv.com/de/Live

I worked in Germany for years. One Christmas we had a night out with both German and Brit workers from our factory. Towards the end of the night a couple of the guys stood on a table, lifted beer glasses to their eyes and did the Dambusters tune. Our German shop manager took no offence and replied with a German song called London's Burning. It's called banter but the press here don't want to look at it that way. I await the demands for passports to be confiscated.

Now there's an idea Ian. :devil: Thanks mate.

Every single Rangers match I've seen covered on tv has ended with the pundits concentrating on whether one of our players committed a foul, dived, should have been sent off, or whether some throw in or corner should have been awarded to us. Such incidents are shown dozens of times from all angles and covered at the end of the match too. Goals take a minor place now unless it was scored by us with some perceived controversy involved. It's now got to the completely silly and sinister stage. Naturally all this is picked up by the fuds now posing as press reporters and is mentioned in the papers before becoming the main talking point on the sports sections of our tv news programmes. If I was wearing green and grey hoops I'd begin to think some conspiracy was at work.

Sutton, cretin and cheat that he is, is now simply trying to be controversial to keep himself in the limelight and in employment. Nothing he says has any credibility or worth.

The inverted commas go without saying mate. In fact though, it was through sheer hatred and nothing else.

Scottish football - the organisation that hated itself into oblivion.

Or The Celtic Football and Athletic Company Limited ? https://galluspioneer.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/celtic-newco-the-proof/

I saw some fanny, Doncaster I think it was on STV news bumming about how our game is in "robust health".

I filled in and signed up those cards [the old Strathclyde area] every time I went on holiday from the early 80's until just a few years ago Pete. Your sister may well have had somebody tell her that the police would keep an extra eye on her house but that was not what the scheme was designed for. There was a section where you left contact details of anybody else looking after your house or who would act as keyholder or be able to contact the householder who was away in any emergency. Another section was to leave details of any hazards, ie large holes around the house which may harm any cops attending. House alarms were covered in another section. The main thrust was leaving details of somebody for the police to contact should the house get broken into, go on fire or anything else. Thankfully I was never contacted. Sympathy with your sister though mate.