-
Posts
16,739 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
180
Everything posted by CammyF
-
Thought I was on ignore . Told you you'd be having a wee peak back and forth. Hard of thinking you say ........
-
It would apear to be people who have issues with the UBs who are critical of the statement and protest. I pointed out yesterday that this is a joint statement / protest from UB and RSA. Weirdly all criticism is aimed solely at UB so either those who have seen and are reacting to it have either missed the RSA being involved or are just blindly directing all their ire at UBs.
-
I believe this is the first in a series of planned protests. People can choose if they want to leave or stay and I for one have no issues with either. I understand people can't make games for various reasons, I've missed games this season. What I was getting at are those on social media criticising the two organisations, their statement and particularly their protest whilst sitting in their homes watching the game on a fire stick. Those who choose to leave today have actually bothered to get of their arse and go and watch the dross we are continuing to witness and are continuing to invest in the club. We get told there is nothing we can do to force change, but there is plenty we can do (if we choose) to show our displeasure.
-
No, I'm asking if those critical of the UB / RSA statement will be at the game today and will stay for 90mins. The protest asks people who are at the game to leave on 55mins. I'll be at the game today and will stay to the final whistle but have no issue with UB / RSA statement or anyone who decides to leave on 55mins.
-
Those being labelled "hard of thinking" and having "short term priorities" are the single biggest investors the club has. I've heard said that without the board, we wouldn't have a club. The same can be said of those "hard of thinking" short-term priority people". Without "them", there is no club. Those advocating sacking the manager are not hard of thinking or looking short term. They have witnessed the current manager fall 18 points behind this season from position of being favourite to win the league last season l. On Thursday evening, we started the game with 9 of his signings playing (so there goes the Beale excuse) and finished it with circa £30M of "talent" on the pitch. The excuse of injuries is hard to swallow when Dundee had 10 player out injured and still manged a comfortable draw. Our away form is horrific and getting worse, the manager takes full responsibility for that. We are only 7 points clear of Aberdeen who haven't won a game in 10 attempts. We are saying that in "normal" circumstances that Clement would be sacked, when in reality he should be sacked in any circumstance. Hopefully Stewart will be true to his word and if results, especially away from home don't improve he'll do something that should have been done weeks / months ago. This post is specifically about the manager and nothing else.
-
Ex-Rangers target Morgan Whittaker scored winner for Plymouth at Brentford. West Borm destroyed 5-1 after taking lead at Bournemouth
-
I, maybe due to clutching at straws, think he will. He has to, or he's just another waste of a wage.
-
The part that jumped out at me was the external review of operations starting on Monday. This will be led by Stewart but conducted and, if I'm reading it correctly, implemented / accelerated by independent football minded people.
-
-
Probably did to be fair.
-
No, the second best was 19 years ago, then third 18 years ago and so on.
-
Going to jinx it, but our home form / results are not an issue. Draw with DUFC the only blemish. St Johnstone bottom of the league and with a worse away record than we have, all points to a home win. Team selection will be down to who is fit. Looking forward to tomorrow - freezing cold, toxic atmosphere, half empty stadium.
-
But SG showed progression year on year and inherited an absolute shit show. Don't think we can argue about the "ran the club better to support the managers" can we?
-
Hard to disagree with
-
If that's the sum of ambition, imagination and hope you can dredge up to disprove my argument then my points stand. I've lost the will / energy to discuss this. If you believe we have ambition, imagination and hope with the current incumbents (board and manager) then fine. Good luck.
-
They were necessary to get rid of the spivs and must be remembered and thanked for that. However, they are tarnishing their reputation and putting the club at risk since then. They have finally appointed people with football experience but it all appears too little, too late. I'm sure Mr Stewart is addressing the media / fans at 11:00AM today, probably with a re-recorded interview, so be interesting to hear what he has to say.
-
Yip, just read @BlackSocksRedTops post above. Rangers Football Club, only in name. A shadow of what it once was. Zero ambition, zero imagination, zero hope.
-
It may have changed, but junior clubs could pay to participate in the Scottish Cup (positive Linlithgow Rose done it a few times). But agree, some junior clubs can get quite far into the compition and can hold their own. One of my best football memories was watching Bo'ness United beat Queens Park in the Scottish Cup (2010).