Jump to content

 

 

Rousseau

  • Posts

    20,960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    220

Everything posted by Rousseau

  1. Please be careful to only post once. I do just take the last prediction, if you do post more than once, but it is easier of you just post once -- you can always change it up to kick-off.
  2. Rewards for optimism this round - quite a few predicted draws or defeats... GIRUY!! BEARGER, coop, gs, whosthedado, Gaffer, Colinstein, craig, rbr, lenny3k, Yorkie, onevision, t-1000, TB, FS, Rousseau, les186, Barebear, JFK, BF, Pete, Boabie and Uilleam all gained 1 point for the Correct Result. Coop, Colinstein, FS, BF and boabie gained another 1 point for the Correct Number of Rangers Goals. Lenny3k, onevision and boabie gained 2 points for Tavernier as FGS. No one got the Correct Score -- a couple were very close. Latest Standings: IFRAME Not Available. Direct Link to Spreadsheet.
  3. Surely that's what the DoF has been doing, drawing up a list, which I expect DM to be on?
  4. Not this again... Surely it's just a perception because there are fewer of them? Relatively speaking, there won't be a lot of them: there is 1 'keeper to every 10 outfield players. There are plenty of good managers that were 'keepers: Slutsky is doing well with Hull, Santos has Wolves top of the table, and Lopetegui is the Spain manager. (Those are just off the top of my head.) Although, I do think that defensive players seem to make the best managers - when you'd think it would be the more creative types? And, arguably the best manager around at the moment (Guardiola) was a Defensive-midfielder and sweeper at times.
  5. You know, I started it, and now...
  6. Rangers 1 - 0 Aberdeen Windass
  7. Rousseau

    Pena

    Miller is hardly much better!
  8. Rousseau

    Pena

  9. When you see the odds on McLeish shortening... And when you see he's had no contact:
  10. That's it! We're now so desperate, we're scraping the bottom of the barrel for names...
  11. We played ok the first half, but didn't have any quality in the finishing -- Miller lines up a free hit to smash it into the net, and it trundles into the 'keeper's hands! Awful. The second half was the worst I've seen. I don't think it's a formational issue -- although going to 3-5-2 may help -- I think it's a playing style/philosophy problem; we can't seem to play the ball through midfield. How many times did the ball go wide to John, then he looked to find a man up the line only for him to back out and play it back to Wilson? The first half we got into the final third -- mostly because Dundee kept giving the ball away, but we we did ok. The second half Dundee seemed to block the ball up the line and we were screwed! We didn't know what to do? Were Hamilton not bottom when we played them? And now Dundee were bottom last night? Brutal. We are shite, but a win would've got us into 2nd! I'm starting to think a manager that plays the percentage game, like McInnes, would get us into 2nd for the next few seasons. Allow us to rebuild, with regular income etc. and stability. But we're not overcoming Them anytime soon like that.
  12. TB had him sussed before he had signed! Useless this season. He played well last season, but this season he has been absolutely brutal!
  13. [tweet]934131143858970626[/tweet]
  14. Yes, that would be a good option too.
  15. A number 10, or second-striker, coming deep into midfield is nothing new and can be an effective ploy. It's just that Miller is crap at it. I think we have to differentiate between the role -- which is good and effective -- and the player -- who is crap at it! I think Windass would be better at it: he's got good ball control, he's creative, and can get up and support Morelos more quickly with his pace. Pena is better at the top end, but I don't see him creating from deep as well. Having two players behind him [Windass] will negate his poorer defensive game, to a certain extent.
  16. This is becoming laughable.
  17. Another wee dig at Pedro... Good read, though... apart from that sentence.
  18. Born in Greece. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Okay... Seriously--I've been aware of him for a few years but I can't recall how or why. It was his tactical approach that drew me in, along with his record of success -- I'm not sure how appropriate his A-League success is as it's not the greatest of quality; but winning several league titles has to count for something. I think it was the way they played in the 2014 World Cup, rather than their results -- defeats against Spain, Chile and Netherlands in a tough group.
  19. Fair enough, but I took it as managerial experience in the Scottish game. My point still stands.
  20. Yes. I don't think it's a prerequisite to success. Rodgers had no experience of the 'Scottish game', and neither did Tommy Wright, Steve Clarke or Steve Robinson.
  21. An early article on his Australian 'revolution' from the Guardian: Ange Postecoglou's revolution got under way against Costa Rica but it was a familiar source that gave Australia the winner – corner, Cahill, goal. It was a match which showed clear signs of improvement and a move towards a "Postecoglou" way of playing, but there is still much improvement required and many questions to be answered Penetration The early stages resulted in a few half-chances, and one glorious chance for Mathew Leckie, as Australia played very vertically in attack. In midfield, Mark Bresciano, Mark Milligan and Mile Jedinak looked to play passes through or over the top of the Costa Rican defence and attack the spaces in behind. The second-half introductions of Tim Cahill and Josh Kennedy made it more difficult for Australia to play penetrating passes, as both players rarely moved in behind the defence. Kennedy looked to receive passes to feet, whilst Cahill, as he so often does, received with his back to goal and moved into deeper areas with the ball before returning to the shoulder of the last defender but rarely running in behind. Neither were terrifically successful but showed glimpses of promise, and Australia were much less reliant on long balls and crosses from deeper areas. The direction Postecoglou wants to go will ultimately determine which style Australia plays – will there be a focus on controlled build up play, with perhaps a Cahill or a Kennedy playing in front of the opposition defence as a focal point of the attack, or will Australia look to draw opponents forward and exploit the spaces in behind with players such as Leckie, Robbie Kruse and James Troisi? This is of course a question that will be answered when Postecoglou has more opportunities to work with the squad. Playing out Australia were unsurprisingly much more willing to play out from the back, something which was never high on Holger Osieck's list of priorities. Postecoglou preferred Mat Ryan at goalkeeper and one of his key attributes is his distribution. Seeing him warm up prior to the match, practising his long passing with both his left and right foot, was a joy to watch (and on four consecutive occasions Ryan, with his weaker left foot, played a 50 metre lofted pass to within a metre of Oli Bozanic, his target). Ryan was solid with the ball at his feet and constantly played out. Even when under pressure, Ryan was calm and would look for a short option to feet or would chip a lofted pass past the pressure and almost always find a team-mate. This is an element that Australia would have lacked had Mark Schwarzer, who was less confident with the ball, continued (don't forget Schwarzer played his entire junior career, and two years of his professional career at a time when goalkeepers could pick up back passes). Even when Costa Rica tried to prevent Australia from playing out from goal kicks, there was a willingness to play short that was almost non-existent under Osieck. Neill and Williams on a few occasions pushed up the field, faking to go long from the goal kick, only for Ivan Franjic to dart back and receive a short pass – a ploy he would be familiar with, having played at right-back under Postecoglou for Brisbane Roar. Even on the occasions where Franjic was forced straight back to his goalkeeper, the intent to play out from the back never wavered. Pressing Postecoglou commended his side's defensive performance, and there was a clear intent to press whenever possible. "Throughout the whole game, I thought our defensive pressure was brilliant. Even when we were making mistakes with our football, [the errors] weren't causing us any problems because we just worked really hard to get it back and then we could start again" said Postecoglou post game to Fox Sports. Especially in the early parts of the match, Australia pressed with a 4-2-1-3, with both wingers – Kruse and Dario Vidosic – remaining high up the park, positioned between Costa Rica's outside centre-backs and the wing-backs. One of the difficulties with pressing in a new system is fully understanding the cues of when to press and doing so as a cohesive unit. For much of the match this was the case, however there were some occasions where there was room for improvement needed in that regard. This example was one such occasion. In the 38th minute, Australia had a good structure from which to press and Costa Rica were forced backwards. Leckie, however, was drawn to the first pass (black line) and did not pressure Giancarlo Gonzalez (red line). By the time Gonzalez received the ball, Kruse had already anticipated a cue to press and moved in field to pick up the central player, leaving Bryan Oviedo free. Gonzalez under no pressure was able to pick out Oviedo with a switch and Costa Rica attacked. As the game wore on, and Costa Rica's wing-backs became more influential, Australia's wingers dropped slightly deeper to protect their full-backs and prevent potential 2 v 1 scenarios. But both worked extremely hard, but intelligently to nullify Costa Rica's wide play as much as possible. Patience There were plenty of errors in the first half in possession and Postecoglou even admitted as much, but the pressing as a whole prevented Australia from getting punished. Whether those errors were due to an unfamiliarity with the system and the team-mates around them, or they were due to players trying to force passes is unclear, but better patience in possession in required. Better teams will punish such cheap turnovers in dangerous areas, as Australia found out against Brazil with the second goal. After Cahill's goal, Australia looked to take the sting out of the match (although there was relatively little to begin with). There were a few spells of long possession at the back, even under pressure, where Ryan, the back four and the two holding midfielders patiently kept the ball until there was an opportunity to find substitute Tom Rogic – who looked wonderful in the attacking midfield role. If ever Australia finds themselves ahead at the World Cup, this kind of "death by football" patience with the ball, maintaining possession and moving their opponents around, will be key.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.