-
Posts
19,379 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
185
Posts posted by Rousseau
-
-
Alexander
Boli - Svensson - Alves - Steven Smith
Mladenovic
Buffel - Pena - Rozenthal
Sebo - Guivarc'h
0 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
McGregor
Tavernier - Goldson - Worrall - Barasic
Jack - Kamara
Candeias - Arfield - Kent
Morelos
5 -
1 hour ago, Scott7 said:
You are noted for your tactical insight, Rousseau, but fielding twenty one players is a masterstroke.
Enough to get the ball back off your team?
0 -
I love these threads, but I also hate them.
I've got the following, but I'm still annoyed that I'm missing many out!
(5-2-3 - because I need to have a formation.)
Klos / Wattereus
Hutton / Ricksen - Amoruso - Weir - Papac - Numan / Van Bronckhorst
Ferguson / Gattuso - Albertz / Tugay / Reyna
De Boer / Lovenkrands - Mols / Wallace / Arveladze - Laudrup / McCann
1 -
1 minute ago, JFK-1 said:
Standard win and we move into the split 8 points clear with an overwhelming goal difference.
Noticed SG was using a wired ear bud. Perhaps concerned about the risk of someone finding a connection to any bluetooth communication he might use.Nah--He was catching up on the latest Gersnet podcast.
0 -
FT 0-3 Rangers.
We were not great today, but solid and workmanlike.
We were clinical, however; something that has been missing.
I was really pleased with our offensive structure, though: it was a proper 4-3-3, with the wide men playing as inside forwards, in between the lines. Too often our 4-3-3 morphs into a 4-1-4-1 or 4-5-1 which isolates the forward.
Solid, professional performance. Three goals and a clean sheet. We can't argue with that.
0 -
I think wide should now be Arfield's primary position--or at least, inside forward. He is a wide man by trade.
1 -
I actually liked the structure of the midfield and attack today.
The midfield trio covered the space well, kept close together, and interchanged position; and the attacking trio picked up excellent positions, Candeias and Arfield especially.
They've just been a bit sloppy and flat.
0 -
Hat-trick hero Arfield coming off, McCrorie coming on.
0 -
1 minute ago, compo said:
Well howk him then
He's suspended, buddy; he wasn't playing.
2 -
Defoe has been solid. Unlucky not to grab a goal--outwith the one wrongly chopped off.
0 -
1 minute ago, compo said:
Right the games in the bag take off either Jack or Kent switch to an attacking 4 4 2 and give Lafferty a chance playing up front with Defoe .
I don't know about you, but Kent has been anonymous this game.
3 -
0-3 Rangers!
Defoe lays it on a plate for Arfield to complete his hat-trick!
0 -
15 minutes ago, buster. said:
We've played a lot better and not been 2 goals up at Fir Park.
Not complaining but I'd hope we can come out and play a lot better in the second half.
Midfield isn't really functioning very well.
Game isn't over yet so the sooner the better we get a third.
I still have nightmares about our last visit.
1 -
Defoe called offside, chips the 'keeper, scores.
It was on, according to the replay!
0 -
Defoe is pressing the ball-carrier, but is not covering the pass.
Morelos is very good at doing both, forcing the play down one side.
0 -
Me on this thread:
2 -
Am I just talking to myself today?
Nothing new there...
0 -
HT 0-2 Rangers.
Meh.
I think we've been a tad flat, and sloppy in possession.
But, we've been clinical; taking the two gilt-edged chances that fell our way.
1 -
Motherwell rightly racking up the yellow cards now.
And that's without that animal Bowman--who they sold.
0 -
Arfield is really rubbing my face in the fact I thought I had him as FGS.
0 -
Dirty, deliberate tackle on Katic, there.
Andy Walker thinks it's unintentional and has a wee chuckle to himself.
0 -
0-2 Rangers!
Motherwell sloppy in possession, Rangers press, Jack plays in Arfield in space 10 yards out, and he lifts it over the 'keeper.
0 -
Those animals in the far corner throwing lighters at Tavernier.
0
Frustrating XI
in Rangers Chat
Posted
I think Demotion curtailed his Ranges career, so he may have progressed otherwise.
Then again, we've had lads like Fleck and wasted them.
That's a whole other kettle of fish: an unfulfilled potential XI.