Jump to content

 

 

Rousseau

  • Posts

    19,383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    185

Posts posted by Rousseau

  1. 10 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

    so despite  him creating more than anyone else we are holding the ones he doesn't against  him. 

     

    hey ho 

    I love the guy too.

     

    You said you couldn't get your head around his removal. I merely provided a reason. 

     

    I suspect it's more to do with his position: SG wants a inside forward-type, with good ball-control (a la Arfield, Jones, Ojo, Stewart etc), while Candeias is more of an out-and-out winger. 

  2. 5 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

    I will never be able to wrap my head around Gerrard's  views  on candieas 

     

    He was the best player in Scotland up to being dropped last season. 

     

    4 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

    His work-rate is phenomenal, but he just doesn't create or score enough. 

    Case in point: today he's twice had a simple pass to guarantee a goal, but he's hit the defender both times.

  3. 55 minutes ago, DMAA said:

    http://i67.tinypic.com/2u3vbr8.jpg

     

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxxHeYSWkAAReoF.jpg:large

     

    I knew I'd seen stats somewhere. The first link is the whole season and second link is first half of the season at Shrewsbury. 

     

    On this evidence it's hard to deny he actually looks far more suited to playing further forward, his defensive and passing stats are surprisingly poor!

    Thanks for that; that was interesting. I feel he's a really frustrating player! In the sense that he has a decent all-round game, but perhaps not a master at anything. Is that harsh?

     

    You're right. However... :D 

     

    His passing looks poor because he played further forward. (Having a look, he played CM/CAM, ahead of two DMs, in a 3-5-2 quite often.) From a team at the bottom of the league, I would expect a lot of high energy attacks, with little support, that fizzle out. I think that's what his stats show -- I certainly recall a lot of video clips of him running 50 yards plus to take a shot. 

     

    His best attributes are dribbles, forward passes, passes into the box, touches in the box (I suspect the box at Shrewsbury would be pretty open?), and shots. All of that, to me, suggests he suits the RCM position in our team; that's what we'd need. He maybe doesn't have the controlled passing of a Kamara or Davis, but his ability to get forward by carrying the ball will be useful, I feel. I know I was rather frustrated at our inability to carry the ball past players last season, to open up space. 

     

    His defensive duels and fouls interest me: he makes a lot of duels and fouls, but loses most of them. I suspect he's stopping counters. I doubt he'll win many, chasing back that way. Again, I think that suits a RCM role in our team. If we're countered, I'd like our players to foul. I don't need to tell you about Man City! The least little hint of a counter and Fernandinho has clattered the attacker! We need that. 

  4. 3 minutes ago, alexscottislegend said:

    I'm sure you will agree that Docherty is really a right centre attacking mid. Actually he could be the surprise package. 

    I agree he should be on the right, but I don't think he has enough in his game to play RAM.

     

    I see him as an industrious, box-to-box player, arriving into the box; which is perfect for those LCM/RCM positions we employ.

     

    I agree he could be a really good option for us this season. I hope it works out for him.

  5. 2 minutes ago, Gaffer said:

    That suggests there's been an issue with him and the management because it can't be about his abilities.  Oh well, their loss is our gain if it happens.  This is a coup if we get this one across the line.

     

    After watching Ojo yesterday I've been buzzing, and the good news keeps coming.

    Some of the Swedish publications I was trying to read all hint at a problem with the club. It sounds like they want to move him on. It happens over there. The translation was poor so I couldn't get much more than that. 

  6. I don't really understand the 'we don't need three sitting midfielders' criticism. I think it misunderstands their role and position in the team. I would agree if it was the traditional destroyer-type defensive midfielder, where that's all he does, but our three-man midfield is the basis of our whole offensive structure. It provides the support and organisation for the front-three and full-backs. It's not as if they're sitting back and letting the others do the attacking, they're supporting them, providing a passing option. They also should be getting into the box when appropriate too -- see Jack yesterday. 

     

    A loose example would be Guardiola's use of full-backs. At times they bomb forward, but mostly they stay back in a central midfield position. Guardiola likes a 2-3, or 3-2 set-up with his CBs, FBs and DM. They provide the support for the front players, and defend against counters. Walker does bomb forward on the overlap at times, but he's mostly playing as a right-sided CB. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.