.png.7b01ce7357a7730d478c6dae8134de1b.png)
Rousseau
-
Posts
19,340 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
185
Posts posted by Rousseau
-
-
29 minutes ago, JohnMc said:
There was a Danish left back joined Rangers in the 80s by the name of Jan Bartram. He was highly rated, ended up spending most of his career in the Bundesliga and became the first choice Danish international left back at a time when Denmark had a good team. He joined Rangers and it was a disaster, he clearly hated the place, he left after 6 months, during that time he failed to dislodge Stuart Munro as our left back, gave an interview to a Danish paper where he described Souness as a 'beast' and a 'bastard' and complained about the physical nature of football in Scotland. He wasn't a bad player, just a bad fit.
Lammers feels like this decade's Bartram. It's better all round if he leaves, he's not a bad player, just a bad fit.
Wikipedia:
"[Bartram] got his national breakthrough with AGF in the top-flight Danish 1st Division championship as a left-sided attacking midfielder, and helped the club win the 1986 1st Division championship."
"[Bartram] signed for Scottish club Rangers, but his stay was a short one. He was assured by Rangers manager Graeme Souness that he would fit into his tactics, but found himself deployed as a strictly defensive full back."
Poor fit, or not used properly?
0 -
4 hours ago, Devil's advocaat said:
794 minutes in 365 days?. Welcome to the ward, son.
He hasn't been injured, as far as I can see - it's just the nature of the Argentine league, which is split up. Fbref, I believe, don't have data for every competition.
1 -
-
Galdames looks to be an extremely defensive LB (played CB once).
I have always wondered if Clement will transition us into a 3-4-3, which he liked at Brugge.
Galdames would fit into a back-three.
2 -
I liked the profile of Cordoba, but I always thought he looked extremely clumsy on the clips I saw.
2 -
McLean is too old.
4 -
-
I plan to run a Euro 2024 prediction league, as is tradition now. A simpler and shorter game.
Any interest?
1 -
1 hour ago, Uilleam said:
Erm......I forget.
Probably for the best.
0 -
Bluedell (2.11) and T-1000 (1.96) had the best points-per-game (ppg) scores, which is impressive considering they both missed 4 games.
FA1833 (1.65) and Stewarty (1.60) played very few games, but their ppg would get them into the top 10-12 if they played all games.
Seven Maximums from Bluedell is just ridiculous. The second best tally is a group of seven with 2!
Yorkie Bear, Ted McMinnime and 26th of foot were the best at hitting the Correct Result, with 41 each. Onevision, Lenny3k and Mack1950 were quite strong on this metric.
Bluedell (22) and Ted McMinnime (20) were best at getting the Correct Number of Rangers Goals. Malangsob gets into the top 10 in this metric.
Bluedell and Rousseau top the First Rangers Goalscorer charts, with 14. Graeme and SBG were also strong scorers in this metric.
There was a group of four (Bluedell, T-1000, Yorkie Bear and 26th of foot) topping the Correct Score charts, with 9. BEARGER was a strong performer, too.
1 -
Players Pts GP PPG Max. CR CR% CRG CRG% FGS FGS% CS CS% Bluedell 116 55 2.11 7 39 66.10% 22 37.29% 14 23.73% 9 15.25% Yorkie Bear 109 59 1.85 2 41 69.49% 19 32.20% 11 18.64% 9 15.25% T-1000 108 55 1.96 2 40 67.80% 17 28.81% 12 20.34% 9 15.25% Rousseau 107 59 1.81 2 39 66.10% 19 32.20% 14 23.73% 7 11.86% Ted 106 59 1.80 2 41 69.49% 20 33.90% 12 20.34% 7 11.86% 26th of foot 104 57 1.82 1 41 69.49% 18 30.51% 9 15.25% 9 15.25% Devil 98 57 1.72 2 40 67.80% 15 25.42% 11 18.64% 7 11.86% SBG 95 55 1.73 1 37 62.71% 17 28.81% 13 22.03% 5 8.47% BEARGER 94 56 1.68 2 38 64.41% 16 27.12% 8 13.56% 8 13.56% compo 87 59 1.47 2 39 66.10% 15 25.42% 6 10.17% 7 11.86% Dado 85 59 1.44 1 38 64.41% 14 23.73% 6 10.17% 7 11.86% DJRFC 83 57 1.46 0 37 62.71% 14 23.73% 10 16.95% 4 6.78% r_s 77 53 1.45 1 34 57.63% 13 22.03% 9 15.25% 4 6.78% Malangsob 76 58 1.31 1 34 57.63% 17 28.81% 5 8.47% 5 8.47% lenny3k 75 59 1.27 0 38 64.41% 12 20.34% 8 13.56% 3 5.08% onevision 74 59 1.25 0 38 64.41% 9 15.25% 9 15.25% 3 5.08% CammyF 68 52 1.31 1 36 61.02% 13 22.03% 5 8.47% 3 5.08% Franc Ergs 67 50 1.34 0 33 55.93% 15 25.42% 5 8.47% 3 5.08% Graeme R 66 58 1.14 0 36 61.02% 5 8.47% 11 18.64% 1 1.69% MacK1950 65 59 1.10 0 38 64.41% 12 20.34% 3 5.08% 3 5.08% Bill 64 49 1.31 0 33 55.93% 10 16.95% 3 5.08% 5 8.47% ian1964 53 36 1.47 1 22 37.29% 6 10.17% 8 13.56% 3 5.08% TB 48 35 1.37 1 25 42.37% 7 11.86% 5 8.47% 2 3.39% MoodyBlue 48 37 1.30 0 25 42.37% 6 10.17% 4 6.78% 3 5.08% BSRT 40 29 1.38 0 17 28.81% 7 11.86% 5 8.47% 2 3.39% FA1833 28 17 1.65 0 13 22.03% 5 8.47% 5 8.47% 0 0.00% stewarty 24 15 1.60 0 8 13.56% 2 3.39% 4 6.78% 2 3.39% * Only includes those that played at least 15 games
0 -
Erm... I forgot.
What are your thoughts?
0 -
Let me get over this season first...
1 -
41 minutes ago, CammyF said:
Comparing Souness and Butcher [...] with Shankland is like comparing Josh Windass with Ronaldo.
1 -
2 minutes ago, CammyF said:
What G/90 did Shankland finish up with?
0.65
1 -
14 minutes ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:
First post the day after an old firm loss in a cup final...🤔. Call me paranoid but I smell something rat like...
Third post. First in two years. All three on the exact same subject.
Strange, but nothing inherently wrong with it.
0 -
17 minutes ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:
Negri's must be the best goals per game ratio?
Transfermrkt has his Goals per 90 at 0.95, but I'm not sure about their data.
Dessers this season has 0.42 G/90, for comparison.
0 -
3 minutes ago, CammyF said:
Would be that including penalties? Boyd, Miller, McCoist, Hateley etc all took pens where Morelos and Dessers don't.
It must be because Tavernier is hitting 18-19 in the last three years (excluding this year).
0 -
The average tally since 56/57 (European football era) is 26.
1 -
14 minutes ago, CammyF said:
If he'd taken our penalties he would have.
When was the last striker to score 40 goals for us in a season?
12 minutes ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:McCoist?
McCoist scored 49 in 92/93.
We barely get over 30 since then (except for Negri's 37 in 97/98).
1 -
2 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:
You are comparing a turd sandwich with a poop taco. Neither is the answer and we should cash in on both.
I'm just proving my point, which you rubbished.
One played as a #9, and got 19 xG worth of chances. One was played everywhere else, and got 4 xG worth of chances.
(Lammers in the Eredivise has an xG of 9 (scored 10), playing as a #9.)
All I'm saying is, he'll maybe do better as a #9.
I'm not saying he's the answer.
I have always said that all of our players are for sale if we get a decent offer.
0 -
6 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:
Playing him as a 9 doesn’t change that when he had good chances for us he couldn’t take them.
He has an xG of 4 for his time with us (scored 2).
Dessers has an xG of 19 (scored 16).
Which one played as the #9?
Edit: Lammers in the Eredivise has an xG of 9 (scored 10).
0 -
12 minutes ago, CammyF said:
Or find out what Utrecht have done to transform him into an effective, free scoring number 9.
Playing him as a #9 is a start...
1 -
33 minutes ago, PoohBear said:
We definitely need to sell him, he's had a great second half of the season and surely there will be teams willing to buy him. The risk is high if he comes back, he may not perform again and we will be stuck with him.I would still like to see him get an opportunity in his favoured #9 position.
If there's an offer I'd take it, though.
0
The Summer 2024 Rangers Transfer Window Rumours and Deals - Thread
in Rangers Chat
Posted
You often get players that are good passers, for example, playing in Europe at centre-back or as a deep-lying playmaker.
They come to the UK and our dinosaurs think, 'oh - he can pass a bit, let's put him in the hole', and then wonder why it doesn't work out.